Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Sun (Star Wars)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Prince Xizor (if there is consensus that another redirect target is preferable, please enact it - thanks). Black Kite 16:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Black Sun (Star Wars)

Black Sun (Star Wars) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable fictional organization. Sole reference is to in-universe unreliable source. Entirely plot summary. --EEMIV (talk) 20:13, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete NN, lacks reliable sources and is mostly plot. Anything noteworthy can be included in either the article for Prince Xizor or Star Wars: Shadows of the Empire Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 21:09, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect to one of the above. Protonk (talk) 02:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect to Prince Xizor Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:19, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Plot summary. --Phirazo 17:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Already on Wookieepedia, so Delete per nom. Stifle (talk) 18:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 19:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable fictional element which has not received significant coverage from secondary sources. Article is entirely plot summary. Without acceptable sources, it's unlikely real-world context or analysis can be added. Doctorfluffy (fart in my face) 04:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep as notable fictional organization from notable franchise with sources in existence that just need to be added to this article per Wikipedia:SOFIXIT. Just because similar articles exist elsewhere does not mean we shouldn't also have an article here, too. If we went by such a policy, we would have no articles as everything we have is covered somewhere else. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 04:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
• redirect I'm not sure it's worth keeping as an article, though it is as a redirect. Even relatively minor things in very important fiction like this should have a redirect. DGG (talk) 18:43, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
• A colleague I know wrote that article, I just wikified the thing. Because I don't know much about Star Wars, I abstain from voting for or against deletion. --Keimzelle (talk) 19:29, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.