Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam healey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:19, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Adam healey

Adam healey (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

(contested prod) Doing a google search, I can't find anything that is notable. He appears to be the CEO of an online company, but it has no reliable third party sources to show how he is notable. Soxred93 (u t) 02:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, hit publish too soon, pls give me a few minutes to show how he is notable :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Superhealix (talk • contribs) 02:20, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep article looks much better at the half hour mark than it did at the seven minute mark when the AfD was filed. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 02:48, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Yes, and next time i'll add a hangon tag when i'm in the editing process, *blush* —Preceding unsigned comment added by Superhealix (talk • contribs) 03:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
the tag you want to use when working on an article not yet finished is "underconstruction" DGG (talk) 06:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - Nothing wrong, now. asenine say what? 04:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep enough material now. An inappropriately rapid nomination. Even when people dont tag for underconstruction, they should be given an opportunity to write the articles.DGG (talk) 06:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
    • If they had said why they were contesting hte prod, then I would not have AfD'd. Soxred93 (u t) 15:32, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment - the creator, User:Superhealix (note: Superhealix), may have a conflict of interest here, having also edited VibeAgent.com, Healey's company. This may be a case of a company with shaky notability claims attempting to increase its visibility through Wikipedia. Biruitorul (talk) 15:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
    • I realized that too as well, might be a possible COI. Soxred93 (u t) 15:32, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, seems notable. Stifle (talk) 19:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 21:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.