User talk:Apoc2400

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Log scales image

Hi, I've listed the image Image:Logscales.png, uploaded by you, for deletion as it is no longer in use in any article and has been split in four. Hope this is OK. Mysid (talk) 07:18, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Fine --Apoc2400 14:03, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Asahi Kasei

If you want this article to survive may I suggest reviewing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:CORP and see if you can add anything to it to beef it up. I'm adding a prod tag to it because currently it fails WP:CORP but I hope you can add enough to it so it will pass the requirements. Mike (T C) 07:36, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Fixed. --Apoc2400 08:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] test

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

I suppose you refer to my edit of EPR paradox. Due to a copy/paste mistake, the word "Magic" got inserted. I will redo my edit the way it was supposed to be. --Apoc2400 04:00, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Script

Yes, I could do that for you. Peter O. (Talk) 16:34, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Differences between the W.I.T.C.H. comic and animated series

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Differences between the W.I.T.C.H. comic and animated series, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Differences between the W.I.T.C.H. comic and animated series. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Evil oranges 18:55, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas, and May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg (drop me a line) 20:29, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:NetStorm Cover.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:NetStorm Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC).

[edit] WP: Non-free content

Nice edits today at WP:Fair Use rationale guideline.

Could you keep an eye on Wikipedia:Non-free content? Tony Siddaway just tried to pull off the same stunt there that he recently managed at WP:SPOILER -- rewriting the policy his way, before discussion on any change was complete. It's quite possible he'll try again. Jheald 01:39, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

I will keep a watch on the policy page. I try to follow the talk page too. --Apoc2400 01:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Tony reverted to his version and got it protected. We will have to keep watch, and make sure nobody refers to that paragraph on other pages. --Apoc2400 05:48, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Be careful not to 3RR. We don't want to see you suspended! Tony S just tried to pull his favourite stunt at WP:CSD too... Jheald 03:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry :-) I always try to observe my personal Two Revert Rule to stay clear of edit wars. --Apoc2400 03:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Aaaaargh! I'm usually considered a deletionist and I'm getting frustrated over there! --Butseriouslyfolks 05:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2008_January_14#Image:USB_Icon.svg_and_Image:Firewire_Icon.svg

I have undeleted both files and listed at IfD since I believe a greater discussion should take place, both sides have reasonable arguments. Cheers! -- lucasbfr talk 12:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your question

... has a reply :) FT2 (Talk | email) 01:08, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:NetStorm Screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:NetStorm Screenshot.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 12:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Undeleted as requested. You have 7 days

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:NetStorm Screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:NetStorm Screenshot.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ☑ SamuelWantman 08:28, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your undeletion requests

I have undeleted:

--Random832 (contribs) 15:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:NetStorm Screenshot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:NetStorm Screenshot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed deletion of Foundation for a Drug-Free World

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Foundation for a Drug-Free World, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Cirt (talk) 05:44, 14 May 2008 (UTC)