User talk:Andrew Powell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!

Dear Andrew Powell: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any dicussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!

[edit] The Threepenny Opera

Please discuss any changes you want to make on the talk page first. I made most of my edits to correct innaccuracies and gramatical errors that resulted from your edits. Thanks. -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 05:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 05:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AMA REQUEST

I have opened your AMA case at Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/February 2007/Andrew Powell. Just to make sure, is the dispute still active?--Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 21:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Also, I think that discussing the changes we made on Talk:The Threepenny Opera would be the best course of action for Andrew and me. I may very well have made some mistakes in my edits; let's try to discuss it all. The first step in dispute resolution is always trying to come to a conclusion on the talk page. -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 02:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Semele

A few clarifications. When a full encyclopedia article can be written on individual separate topics, it is common practice for those topics to have separate articles. In this case, it would be common practice for separate operas/oratorios, whose only relation to each other is that they have the same name, to have different articles.

Secondly, I don't think any of your excellent work was lost, just moved around a bit. It's still equally valid regardless of where it is.

Thirdly, Handel's Semele was originally composed to be performed as an oratorio and is listed in most major works of reference as an oratorio, though it is certainly often performed as an opera. The case of whether it should even be performed in this way - as an opera - is certainly a very live debate: under those circumstances it is also common practice to respect the composer's original intentions are regards the performance of the work.

Fourthly, in cases where there are multiple operas by different composers with the same name of roughly the same fame, common practice again is to title either one or both with the name of the operas followed by the name of the composer in brackets. Does this address some of your concerns? Best, Moreschi Request a recording? 13:44, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Philip Eisenberg

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Philip Eisenberg, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Kleinzach 23:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Philip Eisenberg

An article that you have been involved in editing, Philip Eisenberg, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Eisenberg. Thank you.

[edit] Speedy deletion of Japan Philharmonic

A tag has been placed on Japan Philharmonic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)