User:Natl1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This user is a recent changes patroller. |
 |
This user is currently on editor review. You may comment on his or her edits at Wikipedia:Editor review/Natl1. |
Vandalism information
Low to moderate level of vandalism. [update]
Normal to low amounts of vandalism. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 17:21, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
| Wikipedia:Babel | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Search user languages | |||||||||
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Welcome to Natl1's User Page
-
- Natl1's talk page-User talk:Natl1
- Natl1's contributions-Special:Contributions/Natl1
- User warning tool- User:Adam1213/warn
- Natl1's Status- User:Natl1/Status
- For media copyright questions see WP:MCQ
- "Wannabe Kate" Edit Counter
- My name is Natl1 at Wikipedia and I am a Patroller.
-
- Welcome to Natl1's User Page
-
-
-
-
-
-
It greatly distresses me every time I see an RFA like this one. We are deciding whether or not we trust [a user] to not misuse three buttons. That's it. This isn't a review of his articles, or lack thereof. This isn't a critique of how he spends his time on Wikipedia. There is one and only one question - can we trust that he would not misuse the admin buttons. Nobody has given a reason not to trust him. "He doesn't write enough articles" isn't a reason. An RFA is more analagous to "Requests for janitorship" than it is "Request for editor-in-chiefship". I would strongly encourage those who comment on this RFA and future ones like it to seriously consider that we have a severe shortage of active admins and it does nothing to help Wikipedia when we exclude hard workers from adminship.--BigDT
-
-
-
-
-
Last updated 20:00, 13 June 2008 (UTC) by Tangobot |
