User talk:Alex.muller/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Evil evil boy

so yeah.. my opera decided to update itself while writing this so i cant be bothered to write this out nicely.
from us census data we can see that 25.8% of the population of georgia is in the age range 5-22
9,544,750 x 0.258 = 2,462,546
thats near enough 2.5 million as makes no difference —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.247.131 (talk • contribs) 2008-02-28T16:57:44

Thanks

{{Talkback}}: Message copy

Thanks

Just wanted to say, you're doing a great job. Keep it up! —Preceding unsigned comment added by CMoosey (talk • contribs) 14:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks from me too! Osborne (talk) 20:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem :). Feel absolutely free to get in touch here if you need any other help —αlεx•mullεr 21:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Wow, i never realised SPS was looked so drab. No wonder they have a masterplan in place. Still a great school though - thanks for your contribs to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.69.169.112 (talk) 04:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

That's true, it is possibly one of the ugliest set of buildings I've ever seen, but I'm confident the new ones are going to be lovely :) —αlεx•mullεr 08:08, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Udo

The Name Udo. Hello, Udo Proksch if a convicted murderer had died in custody. To remove my request, Udo Proksch from this list.--62.47.220.81 (talk) 10:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I blocked what is presumably another IP of yours (62.47.215.184) for 24 hours for continuing to change the page Udo. Udo Proksch was clearly a businessman, the fact that he died in custody is irrelevant and won't help people find information about him. Please don't use this IP address to edit that page, or there's a possibility it will be blocked as well. Cheers —αlεx•mullεr 11:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Message

Hello,

My name is Alex Muller and I live in the United states. I just wanted to say hello and note that i have NEVER found someone with the same name as my own. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.28.202.53 (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

(some formatting retardation went on there so I sorted it out) ʈɧɛ fɨʂɧ (talk) 22:57, 9 March 2008 (UTC))

Very cool – as much as Wikipedia isn't meant to be a social networking site, it's definitely an interesting place to meet people. Interestingly, I've never met someone with the same name as me either :) —αlεx•mullεr 20:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Apologies

I'm a newpage patroller and I acted rashly on your St Georges Public School page. Thousand apologies. Porterjoh (talk) 17:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem at all – I really hate judging on articles about schools, so I have a tendency to try and save them wherever possible. Keep on doing what you're doing —αlεx•mullεr 20:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Religious bigot

Why do you attack my religion? What have I done to you?

Xenu article is attacking and slandering my faith and religion. I demand this is fixed, right here, right NOW! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.156.1.46 (talk) 20:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Erm, OK. Except I have absolutely no clue about Xenu at all, and I don't have a religion. So... —αlεx•mullεr 20:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Swami284

See Greg Staley. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Was that meant for me? I can't see any involvement I've had thus far —αlεx•mullεr 18:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
'Twas an attack page. The same editor had created Will Zullo, which you deleted. Nevermind, it's all gone away now. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Ah, OK – sorry I didn't get there in time —αlεx•mullεr 18:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
No worries. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:47, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

- CobaltBlueTony™ talk has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

informatron

re Read the definition of vandalism. I was adding a preface to the paragraph that followed which was in no way accurate or encyclopedic. It was simply a derogatory and immature opinion of the writer and this is exactly what I said.

the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism. For example, adding a personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated. Not all vandalism is obvious, nor are all massive or controversial changes vandalism. Careful attention needs to be given to whether changes made are beneficial, detrimental but well intended, or outright vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Informatron (talk • contribs) 22:32, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I considered your edit that I reverted to be completely unconstructive to the encyclopaedia, which is why I (and, I notice, other editors later on) reverted the changes 22:55, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism by 217.23.238.227

Hi, I have seen you recently reverted changes by this user ... and he has edited more articles since then, e.g. Protocol (computing). Maybe you could have a look, thanks! - 83.254.215.235 (talk) 17:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Y Done and warned – I'll keep an eye on that IP address for the next few days, thanks for the tip —αlεx•mullεr 20:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Great, thanks :) - 83.254.215.235 (talk) 21:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

edit to wikipedia talk:WIkiProject China

The removed material was archived to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject China/Archive/December 2007. Please do not revert again. --Slashem (talk) 08:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Apologies. I was using huggle, which moves quite fast, and the edit was incredibly large —αlεx•mullεr 09:12, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Articles for Deletion by 59.167.45.168

Howdy! Just saw your message on 59.167.45.168's talk page about the AfD thingys he/she has put on a number of websites. Sorry this is brief, I'm just about to head out for work - he/she seems to have focused on a large number of The Bill characters pages, for example Liz Rawton, Debbie McAllister etc - I have just quickly added a link to the bio page on Liz Rawton's page (www.thebillbios.co.uk)... Anything you can do at all/advise? Cheers! BNC85 (talk) 18:57, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, this is a very interesting case - there's nothing to stop him adding the PROD tags, he's perfectly allowed to. And you should only really remove them if they can fulfil the reason for PROD'ing, which I'm not sure they do at the moment... you can either remove the PROD tags from the articles and face the possibility of challenging them at AFD, or tidy up the articles and then remove the tags, or just leave them for deletion. None of the situations are fantastic, unfortunately —αlεx•mullεr 23:20, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Forgot this....

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You revert. A lot. As do I. Wait, that had nothing to do with anything... 21655 ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? 19:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

I guess this would be your second today

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For beating me to the punch several times today. —  scetoaux (T|C) 20:37, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Do you have a bot running on this account? Oore (talk) 20:47, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm using huggle... and yep, it's so damn fast ;) —αlεx•mullεr 20:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. Oore (talk) 20:52, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
No problem —αlεx•mullεr 20:58, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

SEC

Sorry i am not well Wiki schooled yet but will get there. I was unable to post to your talk becuase you had me blocked. I should have used a different approach other than deleting the article. Live and learn. About OJ Simpson, he killed people, the party targeted in the article was one of dozens in an office for insider trading. Because his name is unique he will pay a hire price than all others convicted as there names fade into cyberspace. We know who the posts are coming from and it is clearly an antogonist wanting to keep this old conviction in the news. Thanks for your patience with this. Cdcflies (talk) 21:44, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

No need to apologise at all - I'm sorry for blocking you, and as you seem to understand what you did, it should never happen again. Fair enough about the article, but I've got absolutely no idea who's editing it... some advice for you (if you want to agree with the content of the article more) is to read through Wikipedia's key policies (WP:N, WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:BLP). If you find anything on Wikipedia that blatantly disagrees with any of those policies, it can be removed, no questions asked. And every administrator and experienced editor on the site will support you in those decisions, provided they're correct. Hope this helps, somewhat —αlεx•mullεr 15:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Care to lend a hand?

I've reverted a vandal over at Video CD several times, noticed you did too. I'm at my 3 reverts, don't want to go over that. The IP has once again changed the article. AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 16:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Y Done and blocked for 31 hours by Trusilver... hope this helps, and thanks for the tip-off :) —αlεx•mullεr 16:54, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks I appreciate it. AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 17:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Rollback Request

User:dolphonia

I would like Rollback so that I can use huggle more efficiently for dealing with vandalism on Wikipedia Dolphonia (talk) 20:26, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Y Done as you can be trusted with it... make sure to read through the page and only use it for obvious vandalism —αlεx•mullεr 20:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks very useful and working perfectly - Dolphonia (talk) 20:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Rollback

Cheers! +Hexagon1 (t) 07:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for reverting the recent edit by 163.153.188.88. The district has reported that they have located the student involved, and are taking appropriate action. --NERIC-Security (talk) 15:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem – thanks for letting me know. I've tagged the talk page of the IP address as an education institution —αlεx•mullεr 16:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

q

hey i have a question for you can you answer it?> —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.248.129.123 (talk) 18:09, 24 April 2008

Sure, try me... —αlεx•mullεr 17:14, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism on my userpage

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my usertalk page. This user is continually tring to vandalise my page. am thinking of putting semi page protection on it so only experienced users can edit. Are you an admin? if you are can you do that for me? Chris19910 (talk) 18:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

You're very welcome for the revert – I presume you're talking about Chuuplo? I actually just blocked him for 24 hours for continuing to recreate the same page over and over (and actually, 24 hours was on the light side, considering what he could have got). Semi-protection won't do much against him though – it only works on accounts that are younger than 4 days, and he's been around since December. If it happens again (from him or anyone else) let me know here and we'll see what we can do. Hope this helps —αlεx•mullεr 18:59, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Tim Buckley revert

Thanks for the revert, i'm doing up stuff on the article and I think it's god damn awful in the first place without the vandalism! And if possible: not sure if you know much about the subject but could you check what i've written on Lorca (album) for style? I'm comfortable with chucking in facts n dates and the sort but very wary of NPOV writing. Any other input on my ideas for Tim Buckley things would be appreciated cos i think i'm working alone in a black hole there. Thanks Sillyfolkboy (talk) 19:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

I've got no idea about the content at all, but can happily comment on the article. It seems fine as far as NPOV goes – those quotations need citations though or they "may be removed at any time" (WP:QUOTE). I won't remove them just yet as I haven't had time to do a proper search for the source, but if you know it please include it. —αlεx•mullεr 12:27, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

IP vandalism

Hi Alex, glad to be able to help. Best, Gwernol 17:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome, again. Sorry you're getting all the vandalism. Best, Gwernol 20:19, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Strange Situation

You seem to be editing presently, so I'll as you about this stranage situation. User:71.215.92.35, who was previously vandalizing the article The Frederick News-Post, is now making a very long series of edits to that page, adding and subsequently removing a space. While this is strictly not vandalism, I was wondering what to do about this. Thanks in advance. NauticaShades 16:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

He's stopped after a warning (or seems to have, for now). I'll keep an eye on the IP address for a bit of time now, and if it happens again will block to prevent it. I'll also see if it's worth deleting those revisions to keep the page history nice and empty. Hope this helps —Alex.Muller 16:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Ha!

My edited info on ANNE ROBINSON was correct as you know.this is wikipedia and users CAN add/edit pages THANK YOU —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.200.224 (talk) 17:32, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

No. —Alex.Muller 17:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

please learn about microbiology

it definitely is constructive. c. trach. is an exception to the rule and therefore should be listed. If you want to remove something, maybe you should add it to the talk page saying, "this was removed and I am placing it in the talk page to be verified."

Learn how to be useful.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.151.254.51 (talk) 01:14, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

You've only been editing since Nov 07 with this user name. Welcome to the club, youngin'—Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.151.254.51 (talk) 01:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm a complete noob... it's actually been a year, that's all. Hardly that much experience. I'm afraid when I reverted your edit before I was using a piece of anti-vandal software called huggle which helps go through large amounts of edits really quickly. I'm really sorry that I have no idea about biology, and with your addition looking like vandalism I decided to revert it. Apologies if this was the wrong decision —Alex.Muller 01:26, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
why can't they invent some anti-valid bot that automatically transfers possibly useful things to the talk page? Maybe you should not use the bot if it makes mistakes. and if your bot is going to revert stuff, then your little note on the user talk page should say that a bot reverted it and not you. Are you willing to make these changes or is there somewhere where I can make comments / feedback on your administrator status?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.151.254.51 (talk) 01:34, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Remember to use 4 tildes (~~~~) to sign your comment on talk pages. Let me be very clear that it's not a bot, I clicked the button that reverted your edit. The problem is that there are so many recent changes to go through to search for vandalism, and I made the wrong decision there, apparently (still taking your word for it, because I don't know biology). You can make comments on my administrator status anywhere all you want, but that won't do any good. The mistake that I made and owned up to had nothing to do with administrator tools or privileges —Alex.Muller 01:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

thank spam

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 194 supporting, 9 opposing, and 4 neutral.

Your kindness and constructive criticism is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers, Anthony and Acalamari for their nominations.

Thank you again, VanTucky

Duchess of Hamilton edit

I think that the edit to Duchess of Hamilton was correct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.76.101 (talk) 21:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Must be...I'll go apologise to him/her. Sorry! weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 21:26, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
I owe one as well, in that case... spooky stuff! :) —Alex.Muller 21:28, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Yep, all cleared up now. Weird... weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 21:30, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

George DiCaprio revert

Hi Alex,

I converted the word "comics" to "comix" in the George DiCaprio page because that is the spelling that distinguishes the type of comics that DiCaprio created - underground comix.

It has been spelled that way since the 1960's when these comix were created to show that they were different from the "mainstream" comics because of their content which included graphic depictions of sex and violence.

George DiCaprio was friendly with some of the main creators of underground comix such as Robert Williams, Robert Crumb and art spiegelman (sic).

I think it is a significant change and I would like to change it back that way in the article.

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.250.216.114 (talk) 03:26, 30 April 2008

Hey, I notice this edit is from the 14th February – at the time I didn't realise that the link pointed to the same article, but if you want to point it to Underground comix that's fine. Also, if you leave an edit summary in future it will generally prevent people from reverting your changes when they think they're questionable. Cheers, hope this helps —Alex.Muller 07:22, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

User talk:E-on software

As you wish, but it would have been much easier for them to just create a new account, since there are no edits :) -- lucasbfr talk 18:14, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Very true, and I only realised that afterwards... ah well, it'll just get turned away at WP:CHU then I guess. —Alex.Muller 18:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

El Farmero (you deleted my 'Kory Bennett' article)

Yeah hi thanks for deleting that I blanked it for a reason...

Kory Bennett is not a very famous man. He's a proffessor. And he does not have any citeable sources. He's just an ordinary person. However, he has a lot of influences on a lot of peoples lives and all of his fellow scholars and students here respect him greatly. So no. He's not a celebrity. He's just a man who helps a lot of people here at the academy achive theor scientific goals. Now you might be thinking, "Make him a myspace and get out of Wikipedia's face" but, no. He's someone who, although not famous, deserves an encyclopedic entry. And wikipedia is the only place that can be accomplished. The freedom of a wiki is so...powerful and has such freedoms that it is the only place where this can be accomplished. So I'm asking you to reconsider. To bend your criteria for 1 page. We all know this guy deserves it.

-El Farmero —Preceding unsigned comment added by El Farmero (talk • contribs) 22:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

We can't bend the rules, unfortunately – because there are a couple of people I'd love to write entries for, but they just don't deserve it at the moment. There are a couple of choices: spend some time putting together an article, find sources, and really work on it so it fulfils the notability criteria... or, have a look at Biographicon (ref). Definitely give the latter a go, if only to start an article. And please send me a link to there if you do, I've never looked for one before. Hope this helps —Alex.Muller 22:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Okay ummm..he wrote an anthropology thesis for the University of South Florida which is on their website....does that count? For anything? —Preceding unsigned comment added by El Farmero (talk • contribs) 15:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Give it a go - there's a page at User:El Farmero/Kory Bennett which nobody will delete unless you replace it with "{{db-user}}". Fill in the blanks and I'll try and have a look or grab some references sometime in the next few days (when I have time). Hope this helps —Alex.Muller 16:13, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Consideration for Boilerplate Deletion

Dear Muller:

We want to bring to you attention the fact that FisherQueen has remove articles defaming “Ron Bongo” and “Ronald Bongo.” Please see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JRS-SEC

And it does appear that this admin has stopped the perpetrator:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JRS-SEC, that is the contributor who calls himself JRS-SEC

We are also requesting that you take down http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_SEC_Boiler_Room_Prosecutions. In this case the users are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chopped_Lamb or/and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smarkflea but we believe its the same person as JRS-SEC under different sign-ins.

While the facts in this article are from the SEC proceedings, the context is totally false and misleading. The term “boiler room” has been used to denote shady securities operators for more than fifty years. In that time there have been thousands of arrests and prosecutions but your article makes it seem like the Mr. Bongo is a “mastermind” and a notable historical figure in the world of boiler room prosecutions. Wasn’t Mr. Bongo’s employer more of a mastermind? Weren’t the thousand other boiler room operators who have also ever been prosecuted?

This article was clearly not written to enlighten the public on the state of boiler room prosecutions. It was created wholly and totally to defame Mr. Ron Bongo.

Here is the true story. When Ron Bongo was a young man who got a job at a brokerage firm that was censured by the SEC. Mr. Bongo along with the principals and other salespeople at the firm were convicted of securities fraud and punished. Mr. Bongo paid his debt to society and went on to another field where he has made a success for himself.

But because he has an unusual name, the notice of his conviction remained to ruin his reputation. Many others were mentioned in the very same SEC document (14 names in all) but because their names were more common, their reputation was not affected because the notice in the back page of Google. Mr Bongo hired us to push down the SEC notice.

For some reason, our helping Mr. Bongo so incensed his attacker that he has worked consistently in Wikipedia and elseswhere (he added Mr. Bongos conviction to various social networking sites.) He has even gone so far as to create an article on "Boiler Room Prosecutions" just so he can "star" Mr. Bongo as a ringleader.

This kind of slander does not belong in Wikipedia which is supposed to be an objective encyclopedia. Mr. Bongo was an employee, a salesman who made a mistake. He was not a ringleader and does not deserve to be the focus of an article on "boiler room prosecutions" -- there have been thousands of such prosecutions not mentioned by the attacker in this article. Do you think Mr. Bongo should be singled out and made to pay for the rest of his life just because his attacker thinks he should?

Please do the right thing and remove all references to Ron Bongo or Ronald Bongo including the false linkage to Ron Bongo as kingpin of boiler room prosecutions.

I’m sure you will agree that Wikipedia should not be misused in a way that serves no public benefit and causes personal harm and pain to an individual who paid fully for his crime a decade ago.

If you cannot remove the boiler room article directly, please tell us how we might proceed to use the Wikipedia Articles for Deletion process.

Thank you for you assistance in this matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.153.87.249 (talk) 21:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 205.153.87.249 Jordan G (talk) 21:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

I'll happily nominate the article for deletion on your behalf, with the caveat that I don't endorse the deletion at all and am simply doing it for you. If that's fine with you, post back here to confirm. I'll then give you a link where you must leave your rationale for deleting the article. Other members of the community will then also give their opinion and the outcome will be decided in about five days time. Let me know how you feel about this —Alex.Muller 21:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

school IP

this IP is the one of fort loramie schools —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.28.47.32 (talk) 13:12, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

That's funny, because the IP address resolves to Virginia... curious ;) —Alex.Muller 15:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

128.243.220.21

Thanks for dealing with the idiot! :) 128.243.220.22 (talk) 10:42, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

No problem! —Alex.Muller 13:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Drafts

Hi Alex,

I have just posted the first paragraph of an article for which I need more time to prepare.

I would like to know if and how I could save the article and work on it before having it published.

If I can't do that, just let me know if the only way is to prepare it outside wikipedia and then input all at once.

Thank you

Email removed

NaturCert (talk) 10:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

First off, you'll need to change your username, or simply register another account. Let me know which you decide and I can help you go about it —Alex.Muller 13:33, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

re User:Colourmoved

Ummm... thanks for the message on my talkpage, but I had already blocked the account for 48 hours for personal attacks after a report to AIV. If this is a SSP confirmed sock I would agree for an upping to indef, but meanwhile I would AGF and let it provide enough rope for an indef if it does it again. Cheers. LessHeard vanU (talk) 15:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

OK, but edits like [1] and [2] are kinda obvious... —Alex.Muller 16:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Apparently these are all socks of User:Random-5000 who's been active the past few days hitting the same pages, especially User:Gwernol and User talk:Gwernol with his stock phrases like 'ghosts eat toast', 'shitter', and others. He makes no effort to hide himself, I guess. Admin User:Oxymoron83 stopped him with a range block a while ago and maybe that has to be considered. The way, the truth, and the light (talk) 16:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

RE:Report

He has only made two edts which were reverted.    Juthani1   tcs 20:42, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

OK, but he hasn't made any edits in the last year and a half. I can't see any reason at all to block that account, and I suspect I'm not alone... —Alex.Muller 20:45, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Thranjo-Kazooie

Okay, let me lay it on you straight. I created an article that was supposed to be a redirect to Banjo-Kazooie 3. I messed up and now it is up for speedy deletion. I, anfish, the author of this extremely short article wants it to be deleted. In fact I will speedy delete it right now--Anfish (talk) 11:35, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

That's OK, I deleted it for you as a CSD G7, which means the page only had one author who has requested the deletion. Hope this helps —Alex.Muller 12:01, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
(Oh, and by the way...) I used to play the first version of this game on the Nintendo 64. I'm reading through the article now and it's bringing back a whole ton of memories, so thank you. And even watching videos of it —Alex.Muller 12:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

IFlewATA.com Deleted

My article, IFlewATA.com has been deleted, and I either would like a copy of it, or I would like to have enough time to change it so that it meets Wikipedia's guidleines. I wasn't trying to advertise IFLewATA.com, but I guess I did glorify it a little bit. Please undo the deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IFlewATA (talk • contribs) 03:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Rfb participation thanks

Hello, Alex.

I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. If you have any further suggestions or comments as to how you think I could help the project, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your support. -- Avi (talk) 17:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

WBOSITG's RfA

Hello Alex.muller, I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for your participation in my RfA which was passed with a final tally of 114/10/4. I'm both shocked and honoured to gain so much support from users whom I admire and trust, and I hope I can avoid breaking that backing by being the best administrator I possibly can. I will take on board the opposition's comments and I hope to improve over the coming months and years. Once again, thank you! weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 20:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Solar 1

Hello Alex. I picked you out at random because I needed the help of an Admin. I created a page for Solar 1. I am having trouble adding images and external links to the page. If you want to know more about the subject, the website is www.solar1.org. It is a facility that houses a non-profit group, Solar One. I created a page for the facility because it is New York City's only self-sustaining (from an energy perspective) solar facility. It is also home to many interesting programs, and is a prototype for a larger building that will be built in the near future. It also sits adjacent to a park which is managed for the city by Solar One and is unique in its own right for several reasons. I would appreciate a few tips on how to make the page more informative and useful. Thank You. -eper1709 Email address removed —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eper1709 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Cool — let's have this discussion on your talk page and the article talk page, it'll be easier —Alex.Muller 15:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Favicon

I gave it my best shot -- Here's a sample browser screenshot of Image:FaviconNew.png, next to the present favicon: Image:FaviconNewSample.png. Lemme know what you think. Equazcion •✗/C • 14:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page –Alex.Muller 15:13, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Permenant copy of today's conversation by oldid –Alex.Muller 23:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Can you please reconsider adding this page ?

Hi Alex,

I followed many person's pages before creating this page.

Roshan_Shah

The above page was deleted. Would appreciate your feedback on what is missing and what more information is needed.

My Husband is a serial entrepreneur and here is what he is involved with

http://www.slideshare.net/bpocanada/gloscon-solutions-pvt-limited

Here is his linked in profile

http://www.linkedin.com/roshan

Here is a newspaper article link about Roshan

http://www.ahmedabad.com/infotech/2k/apr/13net.htm

Here is the URL - Board Member of Open Planner, NY, USA

http://www.openplanner.org/node/314

I just need some guidance on what changes to make to have the content I created listed in Wikipedia

Rina

121.246.82.24 (talk) 01:49, 18 May 2008 (UTC)bpocanada

RfA thanks!

RfA: Many thanks
Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 06:10, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your always impressive work fighting vandals. Also, STOP BEATING ME TO REVERTING VANDALISM! Keep up the fine work. --SharkfaceT/C 20:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

One of the funniest barnstars I have ever awarded, if I may say so myself. --SharkfaceT/C 20:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

If Huggle could cook and clean, I'd frickin' marry 'er. She's simply amazing. --SharkfaceT/C 21:02, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Now there's a quote and a half... I'm so pleased this talk page gets archived, that one's going to stick around Alex.Muller 21:05, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
That's good to hear. Although, judging by your reply, I don't you realized I was being completely serious. --SharkfaceT/C 21:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I hereby award you this barnstar for not only fighting vandalism, but also for supporting me when the vandal was saying some way uncool things to me in his edit summeries Jsmith86 (talk) 22:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

No problem, those edit summaries were ridiculous... thanks for the work you're doing :) Alex.Muller 22:54, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

In which I fail

Sorry about this, I was using HUGGLE and it was lagging and I pressed the revert button one too many times. - Icewedge (talk) 00:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

No problem at all - Huggle's a fantastic tool, use it wisely :) Alex.Muller 00:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

wtf??

wats ur problem wit my page partick reavey?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joey136 (talk • contribs) 10:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

As I explained before on your talk page, there was no assertion of why the subject of the article was notable. Add that to the fact it seemed to be mostly made up, and I decided to delete it Alex Muller 10:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
well it wasnt made up!! he is a local hero from ireland shows wat u know —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joey136 (talk • contribs) 12:11, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Sure. Cite reliable sources... Alex Muller 12:37, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Doctor Who - original research

Alex - that whole section is original research - wikipedia doesn't care that it might be true, only that it can sources to reliable 3rd party sources - there is not a single source in the section. So please don't template people you don't agree with. You might disagree about the removal but it doesn't make my action any less good faith in nature. The template you used doesn't even make any sense in the context of the situation because I DID include a "helpful edit summary" - please think more carefully about how you communicate with your fellow editors in future. --87.112.82.25 (talk) 11:32, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

oh and looking at it, you did six edits in the space of two minutes, there is absolutely no chance that you actually considered my edit before reverting and templating me. I suggest you slow down and consider your actions more carefully. --87.112.82.25 (talk) 11:35, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I was using an automated anti-vandalism tool which automatically presents edits depending on how likely they are to be vandalism. There's a couple of issues here:
  1. You're an IP address, meaning that (strictly speaking in terms of statistics) your edits are more likely to be vandalism. Perhaps consider registering an account.
  2. You removed incredibly large chunks of text from the article, a "technique" typically used by vandals. Consider making smaller edits at a time.
  3. The reason you did specify was inside /* */, meaning that it was only an automatic edit summary, and was counted by the tool as not having one. Make sure the edit summary is explicit in future.
All the best, Alex Muller 12:35, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for fixing that AfD. I had a look at the redirect but, I couldn't be 100% sure I knew what they were trying to say. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:10, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

No problem — I couldn't see what happened with the redirect either, but just reverted to an earlier version because it was the easiest thing to do :) Alex Muller 13:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Hello Alex.muller/Archive 2! I'd like to leave a note of appreciation for your recent support of my request for adminship, which ended successfully today (and to my surprise) with 83 supports, 4 opposes, and 2 neutral. What I have taken back from my RFA is that I've perhaps been too robust in debate and I will endevour to improve upon that aspect of my usership. I would like to thank you again and state here that I will not let any of my fellow Wikipedian's down. Thanks again! --Jza84 |  Talk  11:32, 21 May 2008 (UTC)