User talk:75.109.100.118

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily semi-protected from editing to prevent disruptive actions.

 Editing of this page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled to prevent 75.109.100.118 (talk • contribs • block logauto) and other new users from making disruptive edits.
See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can request unprotection, log in, or create an account.

Thank you for experimenting with the page User talk:The Haunted Angel on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ScorpO 02:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding the spoiler tag to the article RMS Titanic. It is history not a movie. American Brit 03:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

RMS Titanic

Hello. I removed the spoiler tag. This is history, not a review of a film or book. See Wikipedia:Spoiler warning: "A spoiler is a piece of information in an article about a narrative work (such as a book, feature film, television show or video game)". This article is not within those categories. Thanks. Kablammo 03:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Notice

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia because of disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Taco Bell

Your recent edit to Taco Bell (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Taco Bell, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 03:10, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I was not vandailzing. I was adding some info. 75.109.100.118 03:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry but your personal recollections of working at Taco Bell and your opinion that they are good are inappropriate for an encyclopedia article. Please don't add this kind of material to articles. Thanks, Gwernol 03:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

You have removed several user warning templates from your user or user talk page. This is a bad idea. These warnings are not put on your talk page to annoy you; they are put here because other editors think that your behavior needs improvement, and we're giving you the courtesy of letting you know. Please respond by changing your behavior, and please stop removing the warnings. Thank you. --Brad Beattie (talk) 01:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Blocked again for vandalism

Despite your claim that the issue was "resolved" you have chosen to continue to vandalize articles with highly inappropriate comments, this time at IHOP (restaurant). Since you claim to understand the issues involved yet still choose to vandalize articles in this manner, I have blocked you again. When the block expires, please consider making constructive edits to articles. Thanks, Gwernol 01:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

I swear if I am not unblocked soon I will be sueing Wikipedia in Supreme Court. 75.109.100.118 01:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia has a policy that you may not make legal threats against Wikipedia or other editors. If you continue to make these threats, I will extend your block. You deliberately vandalized the IHOP article and will not be unblocked in the meantime. You have no constitutional right to edit Wikipedia, by the way. Gwernol 02:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

I did not do it on purpose. It was an accident. And yes I have a consitution right to edit Wikipedia. "Freedom of the press". This block violates the Consitution and so if I am not unblocked by noon tommorrow I will file charges. 75.109.100.118 04:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Since you chose to ignore my advice and continued to make legal threats despite being notified of our policy I have extended your block to 1 month. if you continue your block will be extended again and this page will be protected to prevent you continuing to abuse Wikipedia again. By the way, "Freedom of the Press" has absolutely no bearing on your ability to edit Wikipedia since Wikipedia is not "the press" and freedom of the press is different from "Freedom of speech". Gwernol 04:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

If I may share my opinion you should not even edit here if you think your going to vandalize and make silly threats. You must be a small child. Anyway why do you edit if you only vandalize? American Brit 04:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

<<death threat redacted>>

Since you have escalated to making death threats, I have extended the block on this IP address to six months and removed your ability to edit this talk page during that time. Gwernol 04:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

I cant beleive Im reading this. I swear if I was the head of Wikipedia, anymous editing would be the first thing I would abolish. American Brit 04:54, 22 December 2006 (UTC)