User talk:66.82.9.57

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Attention:

This IP address, 66.82.9.57, is registered to Hughes Network Systems, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Some ISPs use transparent proxies which cause problems logging in. If you find that you are automatically logged out just after you have logged in, and removing all your Wikipedia cookies does not fix the issue, try using the secure server (much slower) to bypass the proxy. This happens most often with some satellite ISPs (particularly HughesNet/DirecWay/DirecPC).
Notice to Editors:
This IP may be immediately reported to the Administrators without any warnings
This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to past abuse of editing privileges and, as such, does not require any further warnings when it is again being used to abuse Wikipedia. Further abuse from this IP may result in an
immediate and extended block.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log


Contents

[edit] September 2005

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.

Hi there. Please don't add references to T'ien Lung Tao to Wikipedia. It was already decided once that this martial art did not merit inclusion into the encyclopedia. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/T'ien Lung Tao for more detail. Fernando Rizo T/C 01:50, 7 September 2005 (UTC) uhh.. no

  • Hello. I see that you added T'ien Lung Tao to List of martial arts again. Please stop doing so until you've established a consensus for doing so on the talk page for List of martial arts. It may take a couple of days to do so, and until then I will continue to enforce the previous consensus that T'ien Lung Tao is not notable enough for encyclopedic entry. I will treat future additions as if they were advertising spam unless a different consensus is established. Fernando Rizo T/C 01:56, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. Fernando Rizo T/C 02:01, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

What I find hilarious is that I founded Shingon Kenpo and had 5 students at that time. Since then I have disbanded Shingon Kenpo but it is listed on Wikipedia. It seems that Wikipedia standards are based upon how many google hits one gets. Is google truly your standard? Please check out tienlungtao.com and look at the bio's of the people who have left their systems to study this system. Get informaed before making any sweeping comments. If you actually wish to have a place where new and relative information is posted you need to be more than an armchair martial artist.

Dear Fernando, informing people that there is an actual system called "T'ien Lung Tao" does not constitute an advertisement. There is no 1-800 number or anything like that. An advertisement is a means of luring people into purchasing something. Why not write something about T'ien Lung Tao after you have read the website? maybe this way it will comform to what exactly you expect instead of Martial Artists trying to do it?

Thanks for communicating and not just getting into a revert war. I sympathize with your frustration, but most editors infer the policy statements at What Wikipedia is not to mean that a subject must have a certain amount of notability and verifiability before it can be included in Wikipedia, because Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.
If you think that you can find some citations to T'ien Lung Tao in some places (newspaper articles, magazines, etc.) other than the official website and a few websites, I'd be willing to help you write an article that would stand a good chance of being kept. Find some references and leave me a note on my talk page. Fernando Rizo T/C 02:13, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

Dear Fernando, on the website was an article written by a magazine. Dunno how much that helps. Also I have no clue how to access your talk page. Thanks for the help. Please know that it is greatly appreciated.

IRT: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/T'ien Lung Tao Actually, in this case, it isn't the number of google hits alone that determines the notability of the issue, but the consensus arrived at in the VfD process. So, any editor familiar with the subject and the consensus is likely to continue to delete mention of the style. As Fernando Rizo says, you may try to establish notability on the list article's talk page, there have been successful reassertions of notability in cases like this before. But as we say in our disclaimer every time you edit a page at Wikipedia:

If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, do not submit it.

The following links may also be helpful:

Regards, Fire Star 03:56, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] April 2006

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Moe ε 02:10, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Keira Knightley. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. joturner 23:40, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi there.

Just out of interest, why are you editing the user page of User:Joey smith162 so much? This user only ever edited his page for a 7-minute interval on March 10th, I wonder if his page should be deleted, he hasn't contributed since. Unless you are him and don't log in (which would be a bit weird imo). Anyway, I'm just asking that out of curiosity. Regards, IronChris | (talk) 22:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] June 2006

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Yanksox (talk) 20:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] August 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page InuYasha on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Jaedza 01:28, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to InuYasha. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] November 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page LOL on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] December 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. ChaoticGhost 00:29, 1 December 2006 (UTC) (Marc Lepine page)

[edit] May 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to National FFA Organization. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.PGWG 01:12, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to National FFA Organization (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 02:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ✤ JonHarder talk 01:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Alex Wolff. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kubigula (talk) 03:41, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 30 Seconds to Mars. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hank the Cowdog. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Firetrap (talk • contribs) 17:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User:DreamGuy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Patleahy 08:11, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

I wasn't attacking him. I was merely pointing out what many other editors know to be true. I mean, calling Osama bin Laden a terrorist isn't a personal attack. It's just the truth. --66.82.9.57 08:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
This was simply a personal attack just to make your self feel good. You said so in the edit summery. -- Patleahy 08:31, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
What can I say? It feels good to tell the truth. --66.82.9.57 08:35, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Puzzle, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from any site that uses the MediaWiki spam blacklist, which includes all of Wikimedia and Wikipedia. MarašmusïneTalk 08:18, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Sergiogr. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 14:37, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to J. B. Stoner. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:59, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to J B Stoner, you will be blocked from editing. YOU MUST REALLY WANNA GET BANNED, DON'T YA!

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for a period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.Kukini hablame aqui 00:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Mont-Tremblant, Quebec. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.--Qyd 16:06, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


Level 4: Last Warning
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Good Night Show, you will be blocked.

--LeyteWolfer (talk|contribs|WP:AIV) --02:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Account Creation block lifted, please use an username unrelated to User:Cokeisbetterthanpepsi. Thanks.

Request handled by: -- lucasbfr talk 18:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

i really am Cokeisbetterthanpepsi but i forgot my password, so i tried making a new account that sounded straight forward but it got blocked forever because it violated policy, so i tried to create a totally fresh account but it said i couldnt create one because I created an account 5 minutes ago that unknown to me violated policy, i assume from having the same name as my other account in it.

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Prostitution, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Prostitution was changed by 66.82.9.57 (c) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-01-08T19:44:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 23:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Memory has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. – Gurch 18:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Turtle constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. – Gurch 18:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC))

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Oceanic dolphin. – Gurch 18:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Northwest High School (Michigan), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Northwest High School (Michigan) was changed by 66.82.9.57 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-21T01:55:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:55, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 0 (number). Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 0 (number) was changed by 66.82.9.57 (u) (t) deleting 14728 characters on 2008-02-21T23:16:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to February 22. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thingg⊕⊗ 18:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Mass–energy equivalence, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JForget 23:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Deuce McAllister, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Deuce McAllister was changed by 66.82.9.57 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-03-21T16:27:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:27, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Your recent edit to Charles I of England (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:24, 11 April 2008 (UTC)