User talk:216.205.217.129

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This IP address belongs to a Spammer according to PeerGuardians BlackList.


It's just you. Kapur is a professional. idc if u r a proffesional

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:WBBJ-TV. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Gray Porpoise 13:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Heimstern Läufer 04:51, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] February 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Steve Nash, you will be blocked. →AzaToth 02:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

If this is an shared IP address, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --FeloniusP 16:42, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Occupational Safety and Health Administration, you will be blocked from editing. bikeable (talk) 23:05, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to CHUD:

Your recent edit to CHUD (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 05:53, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Monetization, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Monetization was changed by 216.205.217.129 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-10-17T20:08:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 20:08, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Operation Varsity:

Your recent edit to Operation Varsity (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 03:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Rock (entertainer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NrDg 01:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Template:Stem cells, you will be blocked from editing. Forluvoft (talk) 16:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Steven Register, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Your recent edit to Chris Lofton (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Rash has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. BJTalk 12:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Rihanna. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cheers, LAX 15:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to American Beech, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: American Beech was changed by 216.205.217.129 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-02-11T00:34:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Hong Kong constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 05:57, 11 February 2008 (UTC))

Your recent edit to History of Ghana (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cloud. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 21:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Theatre of the Oppressed, you will be blocked from editing. Rgoodermote  23:05, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] April 2008

Your recent edit to Ragtime (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:49, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 10 days. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  Infrogmation (talk) 23:13, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Vandalism

  • Decline reason:

No reason was given for unblock. Please use {{unblock|reason}}, replacing the word "reason" with a reason of why you should be unblocked. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I'm a person trying to create an account, and apparently someone with the same internet provider as me has been a frequent spammer. I would request a window opened within this ban for me to have time to make an account so it can be unblocked, then you can proceed to reblock this IP address."

Decline reason: "The usual procedure in these cases is to e-mail the account request list, but I think this can be done over Wikipedia. If you'd like to supply us the desired account name (as well as a couple alternatives in case it's taken) and your e-mail address, we can make one and have the password (which I won't know) e-mailed to you. — Veinor (talk to me) 01:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I bought this computer in june of 2007, and have never edited on wikipedia in the places you have said i edited in or 'vandalized' in. Nor have I ever asked for an appeal before now. I do not know why you think this IP has vandalized any of these topics, which I did not, and I am the sole user of this computer. Please lift the ban for I have done nothing. I am sorry for whoever had actually vandalized Wikipedia, but it was not me. Thanks again."

Decline reason: "If you'll look at your previous unblock request, it contains instructions for how to create an account despite the block. If you follow the instructions, you should be able to edit. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:49, 22 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

The IP address is not uniquely assigned to your computer; most ISPs use dynamic IP addresses, where the IP you have today might have been used by somebody else yesterday. So even if you haven't edited, your IP address can still be blocked if somebody else had previously vandalized using that IP address. And as I said, I'd be glad to set up an account for you if you would supply your desired account name and an e-mail address. Veinor (talk to me) 14:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)