User talk:206.180.38.20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Project Gilead, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://ntiaotiant2.ntia.doc.gov/top/details.cfm?oeam=396002024. As a copyright violation, Project Gilead appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Project Gilead has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Project Gilead. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Project Gilead, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.

--Ryanl 23:10, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edit to OSI model

Thank you for experimenting with the page OSI model on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --199.245.156.254 18:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Republican Party (United States)

Your recent edit to Republican Party (United States) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 15:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] About your edit to Rome

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Nehwyn 07:00, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during December 12, 2006 (UTC) to Alzheimers

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Dylan Lake 17:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 10-K Thirst Quencher, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. • master_sonTalk - Edits 02:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 15 minutes as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. - BanyanTree 02:25, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 10-K Thirst Quencher, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Hiberniantears 00:32, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 10-K Thirst Quencher, you will be blocked from editing. Chuck Sirloin 00:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] March 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to College Station, Texas, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BlueAg09 (Talk) 21:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Pantheism has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. treelo talk 17:31, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Yahoo! has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Crazy Boris with a RED beard 19:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for a period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  Kukini háblame aquí 19:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to Screen-printing do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. nancy (talk) 18:01, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Hemp constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. — iridescent 18:17, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. Specifically links to diyfashion.about.com nancy (talk) 18:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] June 2008

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Father's Day. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. --Enric Naval (talk) 03:19, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

While I'm sure that you were well, intentioned, you shouldn't add links to sites that have no encyclopaedic content. Adding on Skirt a link to a site on how to make a skirt is *not* adequate since it has nothing to do with the historical and cultural significance of skirts. --Enric Naval (talk) 03:19, 6 June 2008 (UTC)