User talk:Crazy Boris with a red beard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome! Hello, Crazy Boris with a red beard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Ronz (talk) 22:27, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Hello

Hello Boris, I can see you've made yourself at home? Would you like a Granata? -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 22:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Well you see Boris, Granata is very easy to make:
  • 1 part Campari
  • 1 part Cointreau
  • 4 parts Gin (old Tom)
  • Cherry
On the house, keep up the good work. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 23:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I can't believe she did it again!

I explained to that user why Kenny McCormick's article was reduced, and even left her a link to South Park Wiki, where it has been transferred to on account of an agreement User:Paul730 and I had, and she still vandalizes the page, demanding that the info be restored here! I also tell her to leave such complaints in the discussion page. She's got to be a hormone-infested teenager, pardon my French there.

Anyway, thank you for reverting her vandalism. I don't know where to report such things, but you might consider reporting her; she's edited the article abusively four times so far. Thanks again! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 03:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rick Shapiro

The edit I made to Rick Shapiro's entry is a well-documented fact that Rick has discussed publically many times. It was not put there to be funny or obscene. His story of going from a drug addicted hustler to a successful comic is quite extraordinary.

You really should provide a reference to that fact. Please see the biographies on living persons policy. Crazy Boris with a red beard (talk) 21:23, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
It was referenced in one of the links already on the page, but I put in a proper citation now, as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.85.188.212 (talk) 10:44, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User warning to IP71.187.39.237

Hi Boris,

Just thought I'd drop by to say I agree with your reverting this anon. IP's edit to the John Wilkes Booth Lead. No question it was poorly worded and out of place. I was about to revert his edit myself when you beat me to it. The JWB article seems to attract a high level of vandalism and periodically we have to Semi-Protect it. But it seems to me that IP71.187.39.237 may have made a "good faith", if poorly done, edit. Assuming good faith (see assume good faith), a Level 4 Warning is a tad harsh, if it was a first time contributor (multiple users could be using that IP address, after all). My two cents ... JGHowes talk - 22:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

You're absolutely right, I went back and looked at IP71.187.39.237's other 3 recent edits and clearly it's a blatant vandal. The JWB edit, by itself, wasn't so obvious. Didn't mean to patronize at all, your Talk page header indicates you've only been on Wikipedia for a week, so I just assumed you were unfamiliar with this JGHowes talk - 05:21, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Open ISO, was just a quickie test

Hi, yes, thanks (sincere) for deleting the "Open ISO", you were right to delete it, I would have done the same a few minutes after, I was just in the middle of an explanation, and what you did proved the efficency of the WIKIPEDIA maintenance, I love that! Well done mate, see you! cesar

[edit] 'Requesting semi-protection of Earth's atmosphere'

I'm sorry, but I found that incredibly funny. HalfShadow (talk) 21:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Blame my Twinkle-script. And I agree, it is quite funny. We need at least semi-protection of it these days, don't we? Crazy Boris with a red beard (talk) 21:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
I placed a ban on CFC's for the next 5 months... DMacks (talk) 21:45, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Better not go to full protection: we'd all asphixiate. HalfShadow (talk) 21:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Happy Valentine's Day!

User:Wilhelmina Will has wished you a happy Valentine's day, and good luck in love and friendship!
User:Wilhelmina Will has wished you a happy Valentine's day, and good luck in love and friendship!

A short/sweet little message, which I hope has made your day better! Happy Valentine's Day!!! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock, please

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Definitely a mistake

Request handled by: MaxSem(Han shot first!) 11:24, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much! :D Crazy Boris with a RED beard 11:26, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
My apologies, I thought we were under attack and that you were part of it. Panic! Cheers. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 11:27, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] re your message at my talkpage

I have blocked the editor, possibly while you were writing the note. ;~) When I see personal attacks, etc. I remove the vandalism first and attend to the editor later - clean up the vandalism then the vandal. Thanks for reporting/commenting. LessHeard vanU (talk) 14:02, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User page

Is it alright if you change your userpage colors? They aren't very colorblind friendly, green and red. bibliomaniac15 Do I have your trust? 04:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Maybe regular black letters? You don't need to change if you don't want to, just bringing the problem to your attention. bibliomaniac15 Do I have your trust? 21:28, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rollback

I have Boris with a red beard granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

...for this!Cheers. Prashanthns (talk) 20:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dariya

Hi. Could you please have a look at the history (to see the date of the creation of the articles) and the content of both articles? Thanks. -- 81.192.168.233 (talk) 02:15, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My user talk page

Hi again. Could you please explain to me the meaning of the tag you have just posted on my talk page? Thanks.-- 81.192.168.233 (talk) 02:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I appreciate your corrective actions. -- 81.192.168.233 (talk) 02:19, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Revert on nitrazepam

Please will you not revert my edits without discussion because they "seem unconstructive". I am proofreading the section against the references and correcting errors. Please read the references. See discussion and summaries. 70.137.149.100 (talk) 02:37, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Huggle

Man, that thing is addicting. Great vandalism work today. RedThunder 23:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mummy Edit

Hi, not sure if this is the best way to respond - but I have no idea what you're talking about. The article was wrong, so I removed the wrong facts. Did you bother to look at the discussion? I've changed the article back. If you'd like to revert to changes, maybe bother reading the discussion first? =/122.106.209.26 (talk) 05:24, 25 May 2008 (UTC)