User talk:204.210.80.93

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. Your block will expire in 48 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Jmlk17 21:14, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to DJ Sammy, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bart133 (t) (c) 19:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cascada. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. I  (said) (did) 20:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Cascada

Please stop adding OR. It may be true, but without a source, it has no place on Wikipedia. The source you added is not reliable. However, that's 3 reverts for me, so lucky you, until tomorow. Now please follow the policies of WP, and keep OR out of it. I  (said) (did) 20:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


What defines a reliable source? -204.210.80.93 20:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Reliable Sources. I  (said) (did) 20:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Cascada. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. I  (said) (did) 05:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Cascada, you will be blocked from editing. Superbeecat 20:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated vandalism. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. GoodnightmushTalk 16:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cascada. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. i said 00:26, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.