User talk:203.134.13.194

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, proxy02.brs.iprimus.net.au, is registered to iPrimus (AU), and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Your recent edit to Human-computer interaction (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 01:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Lowood, Queensland. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Mattinbgn/ talk 04:22, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] June 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Missionary position. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Trusilver 05:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Regarding your edits to Matt Bowen:

Your recent edit to Matt Bowen (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 09:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jesse. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 10:27, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

Hello! I've seen some of your edits, and I really appreciate the contributions you're making to Wikipedia. I'm glad you're helping the project! You may wish to consider creating an account. It's quick, free, and anonymous (you don't have to give away any real-world information about yourself).

When you're logged in, you can do many things that unregistered users cannot, such as creating new pages, uploading media content, moving pages and keeping track of changes to articles you edit frequently. It helps the community, too - Wikipedians will be more likely to remember who you are when you have an account name!

If you want more information on the benefits of creating an account, click here. And once you've registered, please drop me a message and say hi! Don't forget to sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~).--Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs) 22:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Template:WWE roster. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~SRS~ 11:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] John Howard

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to John Howard, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Longhair\talk 03:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] May 2008

Your recent edit to Sunscreen (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 02:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to History of Germany has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CapitalR (talk) 09:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Cathy Freeman has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. JaGa (talk) 09:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC)