User talk:194.81.151.68

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily semi-protected from editing to prevent disruptive actions.

 Editing of this page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled to prevent 194.81.151.68 (talk • contribs • block logauto) and other new users from making disruptive edits.
See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can request unprotection, log in, or create an account.

School IP address Attention:

This host, willow.solent.ac.uk, is registered to Southampton Solent University and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

February 2008

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Routing worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) • I'm watching this page so just reply to me right here! 11:45, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Prostitution in the United Kingdom has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. EJF (talk) 19:38, 5 March 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Brunei. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Brunei was changed by 194.81.151.68 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-03-07T12:18:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Southampton Solent University‎, you will be blocked from editing. Papa November (talk) 13:52, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

Please do not vandalise. It would be a horrid thing to do. 81.149.250.228 (talk) 09:07, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 09:32, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Absue of administrator rights"

Decline reason: "That is not a proper request. weburiedoursecrets inthegarden 10:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Yes it fucking is..."

Decline reason: "[1]. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 10:48, 19 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "*Sigh* I was only expressing an opinion ffs! Hardly vandalism!"

Decline reason: "You came off a block and went right back to the same nastiness on somebody's userpage. If you're not going to edit constructively, you're not welcome here. — chaser - t 10:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Ok I accept I did wrong and shouldn't have been nasty. But in fairness, if you see his photo on his talk page, you'll have to admit that it is tempting to leave messages of such nature. Anyway, I've learnt my lesson and won't do it again. Please can I edit now?"

Decline reason: "You've had three different administrators review your request. To help you accept that you really are blocked, and to prevent you from wasting our time with any more unblock tags, I've removed your ability to edit this talk page. If you really are planning to edit constructively from now on, there will be time to prove that after your block is finished. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:02, 21 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address (or network) has been used abusively.
This address (or network) has been blocked temporarily or permanently to prevent further abuse.

In extreme cases, an entire network may be blocked to prevent an abusive user from continually changing their IP address in order to evade blocks or abusing multiple accounts. If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please follow these instructions.

Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed.  -- Alison ❤ 14:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Section Break

"You've had three different administrators review your request. To help you accept that you really are blocked, and to prevent you from wasting our time with any more unblock tags, I've removed your ability to edit this talk page. If you really are planning to edit constructively from now on, there will be time to prove that after your block is finished. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:02, 21 May 2008 (UTC)"
I just can't believe how dumb some admins are when they respond to requests. Either that or they simply don't care enough to investigate properly. If you look back, you will notice that the unblock requests prior to the one which received the above decline reason were all relating to previous blocks. As such, I do not appreciate it when, upon receiving a new block, my first and only request is overlooked on these grounds. As such I am reposting the last unblock request, and it will count as the first request relating to the latest block. I hope this makes sense! 194.81.151.68 (talk) 13:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Ok I accept I did wrong and shouldn't have been nasty. But in fairness, if you see his photo on his talk page, you'll have to admit that it is tempting to leave messages of such nature. Anyway, I've learnt my lesson and won't do it again. Please can I edit now? NB: Please ignore all previous unblock requests when reviewing this block. Please see commentary above."

Decline reason: "Email us at <unblock-en-l at lists.wikimedia.org> using your @solent.ac.uk email address to request an account and we'll consider it. At this moment, I am not convinced that anonymous editors such as yourself right now can be trusted to contribute positively to Wikipedia unless we can hold you accountable to your school's IT department should further disruption arise. --  Netsnipe  ►  14:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

You're right; the previous unblock requests were related to an earlier block. I assumed that it was the same block since it was so recent; vandalism began immediately upon the expiration of that block, and so the account was immediately re-blocked. Do you think that calling me 'stupid' and insisting that we should all respect how tempting vandalism is will persuade another admin that this school's students, from whom so much vandalism comes, should be allowed to continue editing anonymousely? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:50, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Ok maybe not. Do you mind if I decline the earlier request myself and produce another, detailing a more convincing argument as to why I should be unblocked. I apologise for calling you stupid, but I wish mistakes like these weren't made, because it was frustrating not being able to point it out once the page had been locked. 194.81.151.68 (talk) 14:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Note to reviewing admins

This IP address has received a checkUser block. Regular admins are not permitted to unblock the account without consulting a checkUser first. Papa November (talk) 14:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Eh? 194.81.151.68 (talk) 14:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I don't want an account, I prefer anonymous editing"

Decline reason: "As much as I can sympathize, there's about no chance of this block being overturned to suit that preference -- sorry. I do encourage you to get an account, as doing so is arguably more anonymous than editing via IP (and, of course, will enable you to edit, here). – Luna Santin (talk) 09:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

{{helpme}} Would it help if I edit-protect this page? The helpme tag is for questions about how to use Wikipedia, not to chat about the unfairness of life. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Please unblock me as I wish to vandalise a page"

Decline reason: "no--Jayron32.talk.contribs 12:49, 28 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.