User talk:193.190.88.130

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 193.190.88.130, is registered to Hogeschool Gent and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] Not In Portland

Please don't add this episode. Episodes aren't added until the title is confirmed by ABC - other sources are just rumors and aren't considered to be reliable for this. The page has been deleted twice already, and it will continue to be deleted until the title is confirmed. --Milo H Minderbinder 14:11, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sona (Prison Break episode)

Please don't add this title yet as the episode title has yet to be released by FOX. The press release will be published soon and is considered to be the only reliable source for episode titles and summaries. Regards, Ladida 05:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Austin Winkler. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Teddey 20:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:MOS

Per Per Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#BC/BCE in articles on religious figures, please do not change to Christian-specific dating schema in articles that have significance with non-Christians as well. -- Avi 21:58, 12 October 2007 (UTC) --> Just about anyone uses this dating scheme with your so-called religious 'overtones' and they are hardly all Christians so this is pathetic.

Please don't change dates to the AD/BC format. This is disruptive behaviour, and you may be blocked from editing if you continue.-gadfium 22:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to LGBT, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 23:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Answer to Gwernol

What I'm wondering is when the Wikimedia Foundation is going to do something about the spread of imagery on this and especially the Wikimedia site that is totally inappropriate and irresponsible for an organization like yours, yet freely accessible to kids. You seem very quick to detect any small changes to articles, especially on topics like gay pride parades, but you seem unable to do anything about members of your site that freely and openly distribute images of nudity and other such sexually explicit content.

Are you still an encylopedia? I'm sorry to say, but I think the quality of this encylcopedia is on a steady decline. Unless you do something about that and redevelop some sense of responsiblity you have as an "open" and "free" encyclopedia towards readers. I won't "vandalize" again now that I've been able to make this statement. Yet you might consider doing something about your standards and look out for the real "vandals" that write biased unprofessional articles and cover topics that are not befitting of a real encyclopedia, and those who distribute inappropriate images through your site that are hardly ever questioned by the admins.

Thank you.