User talk:168.28.128.78

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 168.28.128.78, is registered to State of Georgia/Board of Regents and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] November 2005

This message is regarding the page Robert de Cotte. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. Lupin|talk|popups 20:55, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] December 2005

This message is regarding the page Taiwan. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- pgk(talk) 20:01, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] September 2006

This message is regarding the page Nitrogen. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Jeames 20:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

Thank you for experimenting with the page Abercrombie & Fitch on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. — ERcheck (talk) 00:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Your edit to Vladimir Horowitz has been reverted. It has never been conclusively proved whether or not Sonia Horowitz committed suicide or died accidentally. Harold Schonberg's biography goes into this in some detail. The tone of your edit was also POV and not appropriate to Wikipedia.THD3 01:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Hitcher II: I've Been Waiting. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. NAHID 19:49, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Your recent edit to William Johnson (artist) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 00:00, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to William Johnson (artist), you will be blocked from editing. Neobros 00:02, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of one day as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. - Caribbean~H.Q. 22:34, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 168.28.128.78! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule img[0-9]+\.imageshack\.us/img[0-9]+/.*\.(jpg|jpeg|gif|png|svg), is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 18:26, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wicked (novel), you will be blocked from editing. Rtrace 20:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Ruehl No.925 appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Asmodeus Samael (talk) 00:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Brown v. Board of Education, you will be blocked from editing. --Nlu (talk) 17:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Andrew Young, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Andrew Young was changed by 168.28.128.78 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-02-21T21:25:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Andrew Young constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC))

[edit] March 2008

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Louis Vuitton. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 00:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Louis Vuitton, you will be blocked from editing. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 17:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Goliath (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Gilly Hicks (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. Please do not add email addresses/phone numbers, Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr, or related links to non-talk pages if possible. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 23:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Deleted spurious information ("Outfitted by Abercrombie & Fitch...") and link added to the Charles Lindbergh (diff) clearly made for commercial promotional purposes by an anonymous user via this proxy server. (Centpacrr (talk) 21:08, 5 April 2008 (UTC))

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Abercrombie Kids has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 23:57, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Abercrombie Kids constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. treelo talk 23:58, 5 May 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Abercrombie Kids. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 00:03, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Abercrombie Kids. treelo talk 00:07, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for 24 Hours

To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network.

In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Sauron, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Abercrombie & Fitch has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Gary King (talk) 20:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Abercrombie kids constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Gary King (talk) 20:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)