This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Xiutwel/temp.

Words can capture reality

...let's set it free!

• Dis*cre*tion. n. Freedom to act or judge on one's own - Thefreedictionary.com

When a few wish to control the many they have to get members of the many to enforce the rules that give them the control they desire. There are nothing like enough manipulators, working in full knowledge of the agenda, to police and pen the masses. They have to get the masses to police and pen each other.

To do this they need to target and develop the rule book mentality which concedes all rights to free thought to whatever someone they have never met, and probably never heard of, has decided the rules will be in any given situation. Such people are the unconscious made manifest and without them the few could never control the rest.

These blueprint minds almost always appear in uniform, which is the physical, outward expression of the uniformity that exists between their ears. Look the same, obey the same (with honorable exceptions).

With each passing day, I can see more clearly the parting of the ways between those who are awakening from the trance and those who are going ever-deeper into it. In the small town where I live I observe the zombies-in-uniform and the luminous-jacket-Mafiosi as they, ever-more conspicuously, ply their robotic trade with rule book-in-hand and rule-book-in-head.

--The David Icke Newsletter, preview Sat. 15 March 2008

the oracle speaks....

How can a journalist or a news consumer tell if a story is true or false? There are no exact rules, but the following clues can help indicate if a story or allegation is true.

* Does the story fit the pattern of a conspiracy theory?

* Does the story fit the pattern of an “urban legend?”

* Does the story contain a shocking revelation about a highly controversial issue?

* Is the source trustworthy?

* What does further research tell you?

Does the story fit the pattern of a conspiracy theory? Does the story claim that vast, powerful, evil forces are secretly manipulating events? If so, this fits the profile of a conspiracy theory. Conspiracy theories are rarely true, even though they have great appeal and are often widely believed. In reality, events usually have much less exciting explanations. The U.S. military or intelligence community is a favorite villain in many conspiracy theories.

• [1]

07:03, 9 February 2008 (UTC):

I am currently investigating the merits of the Narrative based fact selection Mechanism (NFSM) which is employed by wikipedians. A great article relating to this can be found here: talk2000.nl. — Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (talk)

• WP:NPOVFAQ:

• the policy is simply that we should describe disputes, not engage in them.
• minority views. It does state that we must not take a stand on them as encyclopedia writers;
• We do not report views that are held by tiny minorities, or views that reliable sources do not write about. Beyond that, we make no judgments. No view is omitted because someone might see it as racist; if it is omitted from Wikipedia, it is because reliable sources have omitted it.
• when necessary, coming to a compromise about how a controversy should be described, so that it is fair to all sides. Consensus is not always possible, but it should be your goal.

• Wikipedia:UNDUE#Undue_weight

• NPOV says that the article should fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a reliable source, and should do so in proportion to the prominence of each.
• We should not attempt to represent a dispute as if a view held by a small minority deserved as much attention as a majority view. Views that are held by a tiny minority should not be represented except in articles devoted to those views. To give undue weight to a significant-minority view, or to include a tiny-minority view, might be misleading as to the shape of the dispute.
• If your viewpoint is held by a significant scientific minority, then it should be easy to name prominent adherents, and the article should certainly address the controversy without taking sides. --Jimbo Wales [2]