Xia Shang Zhou Chronology Project

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2008)

The Xia Shang Zhou Chronology Project (simplified Chinese: 夏商周断代工程; pinyin: Xìa Shāng Zhōu Duàndài Gōngchéng) was a multi-discipline project commissioned by the People's Republic of China in 1996 to determine with accuracy the location and time frame of the Xia Dynasty, the Shang Dynasty and the Zhou Dynasty. Some 200 experts took part in the project. The project results were released in November 2000.

Conventionally, the year 841 BC marked the start of Gonghe regency, during the Zhou Dynasty, and the first year of consecutive annual dating of Chinese history. The Xia Shang Zhou Chronology Project set out to provide exact dates for prior to then. There have, however, been several controversies relating to the project.

Contents 1 Methodology 2 Controversies 3 Claimed results 4 Notes 5 References

[edit] Methodology

The project correlated radiocarbon dating, archaeological dating methods, historical textual analysis, astronomy, and used other interdisciplinary methods to achieve more accurate temporal and geographic accuracy.

[edit] Controversies

There is some controversy over the results of the project. One of the criticisms is that the project supports the concept of a 5000-year, unbroken and homogenous history of China, wherein the Three Dynasties were large and powerful states—ignoring that many other groups of people existed throughout China and Central Asia during this period.^[1]

Technical controversies involve the following matters.

• First, the archaeological boundaries between Xia and Shang and between Shang and Zhou have been strongly disputed (partly due to the methods adopted for radiocarbon-dating).^{[citation needed]}
• Second, the radiocarbon dates were generally specified with only 68%-confidence intervals (or worse), instead of the standard 95%-confidence intervals; this makes the date ranges narrower than they properly should be.^[2]
• Third, the astronomical calculations are substantively inaccurate, or just wrong.^[3][4]
• Fourth, it has been argued that the astronomical-literatures bases of the project art ill-founded. This was partly caused by persistent doubts about the reliability and interpretation of the historical records used for the deduction.^[5][6] It was also partly caused by selective use of the presumed historical record (which, if used in its entirety, might have no solution at all).^{[citation needed]}
• Fifth, numerous unjustified changes have been introduced into the bronze vessel inscriptions, which affect the entire chronology.^{[citation needed]}
• Finally, lack of understanding on the ancient calendar further complicated the matter.^[7]

[edit] Claimed results

• All four phases of Erlitou culture were part of the Xia Dynasty.
• The Western Zhou period was precisely dated.

[edit] Notes

[edit] References

1. Douglas J. KEENAN (2002), "Astro-historiographic chronologies of early China are unfounded", East Asian History, 23: 61-68.
2. Douglas J. KEENAN (2007), "Defence of planetary conjunctions for early Chinese chronology is unmerited", Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 10: 142–147.
3. Yun Kuen LEE (2002), "Building the chronology of early Chinese history", Asian Perspectives: the Journal of Archaeology for Asia and the Pacific, 41.1: 15-42.
4. LI Xueqin (2002), "The Xia-Shang-Zhou Chronology Project", Journal of East Asian Archaeology, 4: 321–333.
5. F. Richard STEPHENSON (2008), "How reliable are archaic records of large solar eclipses?", Journal for the History of Astronomy, 39: 229–250.