Talk:WSMC-FM

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	WSMC-FM is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church and Seventh-day Adventist Church-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church To-do: edit  Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

	Tennessee Portal WSMC-FM is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Watch Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Template Usage]
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's importance scale.
	Please explain ratings on the ratings summary page.

The paragraph that contains "Even though it may be mere speculation, it is not implausible to suggest" seems to cry out for a citation which can't really be done with "mere speculation". It sounds highly POV and doesn't seem appropriate for an encyclopedia. Frankly having the majority of the article discussing one brief episode in the history of the station seems out of proportion. Perhaps someone could add something of modern relevance such as current program listing to help balance things out? Sdenny123 02:19, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

I completely agree with you about that part being not appropriate for an encyclopedia. I deleted that part of the section since there was no citations or support for the paragraph. Immerpunktlich 05:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC)