Talk:Witch's milk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Medicine This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the doctor's mess.
Stub This page has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality assessment scale
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance assessment scale

simply idiotic stuf

[edit] Headline text

an idiot wrote this#REDIRECT Strike-through text[[Media:www.asuhgoogle.com]]

[edit] Vote to move

I'm voting to move this to neonatal milk and instead have Witch's milk redirect there. I believe the scientific term should take precidence. Objections? Please vote. Tyciol 19:56, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

I have no objection, although the word is "precedence" ;-) When/if it gets moved, switch the order of the names in the article lead. Tomertalk 05:14, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Conditionally Oppose until evidence is of "neo-natal" being correct is provided. The external link to the JAMA article uses the term "Witch's Milk" (albeit in scare quotes) and the other linked article uses other terms. AjaxSmack 08:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

I was not aware of the term/condition Galactorrhea, I think it's a great idea to merge this into it, and redirect all different names to it. That helps bypass the controversy of what to name it entirely. Tyciol 01:29, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Well, you don't really need an admin to merge, do you? ;) —Nightstallion (?) 20:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

it's not true that this only occurs with full-term babies, my son was born five weeks early and had this condition


I am sorry to say it but this babymilk-thing must be fake! Can anyone provide any scientific evidence for this phenomenon actually existing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.167.154.135 (talk) 16:48, 8 May 2008 (UTC)