From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
| WikiProject Mesoamerica (Rated Stub-Class) (Rated Low-importance) |
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, its civilizations, history, accomplishments and other topics. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page. |
Resources and guidelines for editing Mesoamerica-related articles:
Guidelines— Outline of suggested guidelines and editing conventions
Resources— Selected resources and compendia of Mesoamerican sources and studies
Citations— Bibliography and pre-filled citations for Mesoamerican sources
Journals— Links to selected journals publishing Mesoamerican research, example citation templates
Article listing— Inventory and watchlists of WP:MESO articles and their talk pages (Article Watchlist)—(Talkpage Watchlist)
Worklists— Project worklists and activities
|
| NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritising and managing its workload. |
| Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's importance scale. |
WikiProject Mesoamerica priority open tasks: (click "show" to expand)
|
|
This is a good but rather basic article on an important collector who also wore many other hats: traveler, antiquarian, expert taxidermist, first creator of "habitat groups" in museum display, showman, participant in mining boom in Mexico, c. 1825, travel writer, promoter of panoramas, etc. I'm a new user of Wikipedia, and thought I'd help out a bit by adding two recent references to the slim list this piece contains, one an article by Michael Costeloe, the other my book, Informal Empire: Mexico and Central America in Victorian Culture, (University of Minnesota Press, 2005), which has two lengthy chapters on Bullock. Infrog removed the reference to my book without explanation. This was also the case at a couple of other articles where I thought my book would be of use to others on Wikipedia.
I'm an academic researcher and am interested in contributing, but my first experience here leaves me a bit cold. Wiki has been widely critized for containing erroneous information. Here, it's simply out of date and scanty. Having experts who've published in academic forums might help, but simply removing their contributions without explanation will only put them off. Rdaguirre 16:35, 16 March 2007 (UTC)