Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Olympics/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Olympics/Assessment is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
NA This non-article page has been rated as NA-Class on the assessment scale.
NA This non-article page is on a subject of NA priority within inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.


Start each new question, comment, or suggestion under a new heading by placing ==YOUR HEADING== under the appropriate main heading below.


Contents

[edit] General questions

Here, you may ask questions about the WP:OLYMPICS assessment process, or about how you can help tag articles.




[edit] Suggestions

If you would like to suggest that the assessment committee change its ways of assessing articles, or have an idea about how to assess certain types of articles, place your suggestion here.

[edit] Precedents

Trying to find precedents for importance levels, I'd suggest:

  • Venues
  • Main Olympic Stadiums - mid
  • Other sports venues - low
  • People
  • People intimately associated with Olympics e.g. Steve Redgrave, Seb Coe - high
  • Gold medal winners - mid
  • other competitors - low

Precedents already set:

  • High
  • Mid
  • Low

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Paulbrock (talkcontribs) 12:25, April 30, 2007 (UTC)

This seems to be what I would think too. I like the thing about solving the venues problem, with the main Olympic stadia (usually only 1 or 2 per games) as mid and everything else as low. As far as people, I'm really not sure how we should do this. What I would say is any non-medal winner should be low, and medal winners, depending on their status and recognition should rank anywhere from high to mid, possibly low. I'm not really sure. Just a suggestion. Jaredtalk  20:45, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Other comments

Anything else pertaining to WP:OLYMPICS assessment may be placed in this section.