Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cricket WikiProject
Lead article talk Portal talk Root category talk Main project page talk  → Featured material  → Notability guidelines  → Style guide  → Quiz Announcements and open tasks  → Articles needing attention talk  → To-do list talk  → Nominations for deletion talk  → New articles talk Article assessment talk Reviews talk Media talk Images talk
Project organisation Members talk Awards talk Project banner talk Project category talk
Templates Infoboxes  → Cricketer biography infobox talk  → Cricket team infobox talk
Studies General topics  → Administration talk  → Awards and rankings talk  → Competitions talk  → Controversies talk  → Culture talk  → Equipment talk  → Forms of cricket talk  → Grounds talk  → Laws of cricket talk  → Records and statistics talk  → Scoring talk  → Skills talk  → Terminology talk  → Women's cricket talk  → Years in cricket talk Biographies  → Don Bradman talk  → W G Grace talk Cricket teams  → England talk  → Hambledon Club talk  → West Indies talk  → Yorkshire CCC talk Cricket by country  → Australia talk  → Bangladesh talk  → England talk  → India talk  → New Zealand talk  → Pakistan talk  → South Africa talk  → Sri Lanka talk  → United States talk  → West Indies talk History of cricket  → Australia talk  → Bangladesh talk  → England talk  → India talk  → New Zealand talk  → Pakistan talk  → South Africa talk  → Sri Lanka talk  → United States talk  → West Indies talk
edit · changes

[edit] National teams and world cup assessments

I am rating all national teams, and all past and 2007 world cups as high importance. If anyone disagrees with this feel free to change them. Ansell 06:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

I notice that there are a few national teams in top importance, not sure about that but I don't want to change it. Also, I should have said ICC test playing nations for high importance, non-test playing nations are mid importance IMO. Ansell 06:36, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Also rating all previous/current national captains as high. Ansell 07:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

I wonder if the balance between team ratings and player ratings is correct? If Test-playing teams' articles have been rated as "high" rather than as "top", then presumably Yorkshire and Barbados and so forth have to be rated one level down, ie "mid" (indeed the West Indies "domestic" f-c teams have been so rated). That seems low in comparison to Test captains and other great cricketers being ranked as "high". (Incidentally, surely not all Test captains should be rated as "high"? How about Chris Cowdrey, for instance? JH (talk page) 21:11, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bart King

I have a question about the importance ratings that are included in assessments. The WP:CRIC standards are fairly clear on how to rate importance. They say that National captains are generally classed as high importance, and players with many tests are generally classed as mid to high importance. My pet project is currently Bart King. As an American he played no Tests, and I'm not sure if he ever captained a US national side. However, based on his position as the preeminent American cricketer of all time is there any support for him being upgraded to "High Importance" on the project scale? Thanks a lot.--Eva ^bd 19:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Table of ratings

The multi-coloured table of article ratings split down by class and importance is very informative, but it needs amending in order to include the new "bottom" rating. JH (talk page) 08:49, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

I now see that BlackJack made the amendment on April 13th, but as soon as the WP 1.0 bot next ran to update the figures in the table the "bottom" column disappeared again. Is it possible to get anything done about this? (I wouldn't know how, myself.) JH (talk page) 19:26, 13 May 2007 (UTC)