Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Assessment/Boeing 737
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Boeing 737
Per my previous recommendation during the Peer review of this article, I recommend that Boeing 737 be reviewed for A-Class status. --Born2flie (talk) 09:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Bzuk
One other thing I have noted is that are at least two fact tags that have to be addressed before the FA Review.
(From Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft. --Born2flie (talk) 16:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC))
[edit] Nigel Ish
- The lead section is probably a little short.
- Some of the sections have few cites - particularly the "Design description" and 737-800 and -900 in "Variants".
- Incidents - this only covers the recent ones, should it cover the most natable accidents from the whole life of the aircraft? For example, possibly Kegworth air disaster as it resulted in grounding of 100 aircraft. In addition , the photo shown in the section is of an accident which isn't discussed in the article.
- References:
- References to Boeing's website should be consistent - currently sometimes Boeing, sometimes Boeing.com, sometimes the Boeing Company and sometimes Boeing Commercial Airplanes.
- Is b737.co.uk a WP:RS? (this will get asked if this gets as far as FAC.
