Talk:Whitehead's theory of gravitation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Stub

At present, this is a stub since I haven't yet added material precisely describing Whitehead's theory or explaining the effects mentioned in the article.---CH 00:29, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Students beware

I created the original version of this article and had been monitoring it for bad edits, but I am leaving the WP and am now abandoning this article to its fate.

Just wanted to provide notice that I am only responsible (in part) for the last version I edited; see User:Hillman/Archive. I emphatically do not vouch for anything you might see in more recent versions. Alternative theories of gravitation attract many cranks, so it is possible that at least some future versions of this article might contain slanted information, misinformation, or disinformation. I'd also urge students to be cautious in using any material from websites found by following external links from this article, since these may be cranky. Note that cranks may attempt to portray fringe science or pseudoscience as belonging to the canon of well-established scientific belief, which would be seriously misleading.

Good luck in your search for information, regardless!---CH 20:02, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Full Disclosure

I just edited the article slightly, including by mentioning an article I wrote on the subject. It seems pertinent, and my article ("A New Interpretation of Whitehead's Thoery") is already mentioned in the article by Clifford Will and Gary Gibbons that was already linked. Cheers.  :-) Ferrylodge 23:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)