Talk:Walking with Beasts
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality. |
| The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Contents |
[edit] Accuracy
It would be great if some info on the accuracy, or lack thereof, of the depictions of the various species could be included. --Batamtig 08:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
I can't think of any real mistakes, other than the one about Phorusrhacos's time...61.230.78.55 13:02, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Episode Mammoth Journey
Please discuss before deleting links to Homo Sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis on list of characters. --Pietro6 14:03, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
hey its been said that there was a horse in that episode but i did'nt see it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.245.110.142 (talk) 00:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Phorusrhacos's Time
I saw a complaint in one review to Amazon.com saying that Phorusrhacos went extinct millions of years before Smilodon ever existed. Phorusrhacos actually lived in the Miocene epoch, not in the Pleistocene. So maybe we should add a section about Phorusrhacos's time, no, I'm making the section now. GBA 04:29, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism
Some guy keeps adding his made-up hoax episode "Vimmy Animal" to the article. Dora Nichov 01:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
What are on earth is hoax "Vimmy Animal" is it? User:4444hhhh
[edit] Episode articles
I think it would be pretty awesome if you could have one article for each episode.
That wouldn't be necessary... Dora Nichov 09:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Crocodile in first episode?
I don't remember a crocodile in the first episode. However, I think I know what you guys were thinking. There was a scene were the Ambulocetus was swimming in the lake and then this animal swam away. I'm pretty sure that animal was a fish not a crocodile. Besides, the narrator was talking about how the Ambulocetus swims differently from fish. Can someone make sure what the animal was? Radical3 17:35, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- I can confirm from multiple viewings (owning the DVD helps, different narrator from the BBC's original broadcast) that it was a crocodile. -- Majin Gojira 21:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- OK, sorry. I just don't remember seeing the crocodile in the episode. Radical3 23:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Similar series about Pleistocene America?
I remember seeing part of a WW type documentary during a vacation set on Pleistocene America. An episode took place on the Great Plains, where two Columbian mammoths engaged on a fight only to be trapped by their own tusks and die of suffocation; they fell then over a coyote (yeah, it sounds stupid, but unlike in WwD/B/M there were cuts that showed the fossils in which the scenes were based on and it was real. There was then a pack of American maneless lions chasing donkeys, bison and zebras(??) that later had to fight a shortfaced bear to defend their capture. The shortfaced bear, described as a carrion-eater, followed then the odor of a death bison to a cave in the basement and died after being trapped there. Other episode talked about Florida, showing llamas, tapirs, mastodons and sabertoothed cats. Does anybody what this series' name is and how many episodes are? I can't find info about it on any place. Some animals looked differently but there was a BBC-WwD style on it everytime.--Menah the Great (talk) 00:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Wws.jpg
Image:Wws.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Budget
Does anyone know the film budget on this? And how much money they ended up spending on it? TeePee-20.7 (talk) 02:51, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Indricothere
I check the beasts website before it was redecorated and found out it wasn't indricotherium, it was Paraceratherium User:Puncharoo 08:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Paraceratherium IS Indricotherium for goodness sakes! Dora Nichov (talk) 00:44, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Brontothere
The brontothere was called both brontotherium and the other one I don't know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Puncharoo (talk • contribs) 12:44, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
No it wasn't. If you know anything KL the brontothere is Embolotherium, it's totally obvious. Dora Nichov (talk) 13:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Brontotherium and Embolotherium are the same animals, they might have made a mistake for the way the animal looks, not to mention the brontosaurus and apatosaurus are the same. User:Puncharoo Read my page first 13:58, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Wrong. They were both brontotheres, but not the same. -_- Dora Nichov (talk) 11:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Lion
The lion was called european lion, here is the link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. Loner (talk • contribs) 11:58, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
