User talk:Wafulz/Archive 12
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Zeitgeist (video)
- A draft userspace article has been created. Please see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 November 8. Pdelongchamp 20:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Pissant
Nice work on the minor cleanup of Pissant. Thanks. Lou Sander 21:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks.-Wafulz 23:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 5th and 12th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 45 | 5 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 46 | 12 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:33, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Roman Catholic Church
Why you reverted my edits on this article? What is happening here?
Either you justify or I will edit again.
--V3n0w 19:07, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- Rather than threaten to edit war, why not talk to the person who actually reverted you? Secisek made the revert, with the reason being: subsequent edits make poor use of english, uncited as well.-Wafulz 19:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
-
- OK then. But how can I see who edited? --V3n0w 19:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Err, the same way you determined that "I" made the edit? Just look at the page history. (the "history" tab) at the top of the page.-Wafulz 19:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- I determin that were you by my watch list... I didn't look at the history tab. --V3n0w 20:09, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- I was reverting vandalism. In the future, use the history tab (it's more accurate).-Wafulz 20:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- I see. Thanks! -V3n0w 20:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
Jiri Tlusty
Not that I agree with having links to the pictures at the page, but I'd just like to point out that I believe that one should not dictate ethical considerations upon others anywhere, let alone on Wikipedia. I'm thinking that it might be better to cite WP:BLP rather than say "legal and ethical considerations" outright. Andy Saunders 03:12, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Eh alright. I just figured that people are more likely to understand "this will get you in trouble" versus "here is a policy".-Wafulz 03:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Request for Comment
Thank you for assisting in reverting the vandalism originating from FYAD. You caught much of the vandalism I missed. I would also appreciate if you would comment on the issue concerning Dans1120 at ANI. Please do let me know if I can provide any assistance. Thanks. Cumulus Clouds 04:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
-
- Thank you for your help in this matter. Cumulus Clouds 06:46, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Blocking persistant vandalism by 129.130.201.154
Many thanks for reverting the random vandalism across a wide range of articles by anonomous editor 129.130.201.154. Buistr 06:42, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for being so quick in blocking Jasonraymond. Hammer1980·talk 00:47, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Pinnacle CEO Recruiters
An article that you have been involved in editing, Pinnacle CEO Recruiters, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinnacle CEO Recruiters. Thank you. --B. Wolterding (talk) 17:29, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Just so you know
This IP range happens to be dynamically assigned by an Australian ISP to all its ADSL customers. Sending warnings (especially such aggressively worded ones) may well be pointless. I just received one for a change I didn't make, and have a live connection that is at least 24 hours old. Good day.
Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 47 | 19 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Impersonator?
Hey, check this out would you? I smell a rat.... The Rambling Man (talk) 19:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Haha, that was... interesting.... Well, he's blocked now.-Wafulz (talk) 20:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Arisaville/Jimmy-Pan
There is nothing in the Criteria for Speedy Deletion that qualify my article. It is incomplete.
It is not jibberish, blatant advertisement, I have not asked for it to be deleted, nor does it insult anyone. It is not for personal entertainment, nor for no reason.
Please remove from Track for Speedy Deletion.
Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 48 | 26 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Grumman F3F vandalism attacks
Can you please check this article; it is obviously sockpuppets of BClimp who has been banned. FWIW Bzuk (talk) 04:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC).
Adri, Marc etc
I guess we were doing the same thing at the same time! What teamwork! --Slp1 (talk) 19:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
