Talk:Vogliatemi bene

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article falls within the scope of the Opera WikiProject, a collaboration to develop Wikipedia articles on operas and opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project talk page is a place to discuss issues, identify areas of neglect and exchange ideas. New members are very welcome!
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Songs because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove the {{Stubclass}} template from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WikiProjectSongs}} template, removing the {{Stubclass}} template from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.

Contents

[edit] The most famous?

I don't agree. I think it could be Un bel di vedremo --195.76.142.130 10:13, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC) es:User:Jdiazch

[edit] Re: candidate to be moved to wikisource

I don't think we should move this article. It covers more than just the text, and, as the article states, it is a very famous aria. Other arias have their own articles; for instance, Nessun Dorma. Moreover, the recording by Maria Callas is a significant work in the world of opera. The libretti should be covered in wikisource; the famous arias should be allowed to remain here on wikipedia. Wikisource is for texts, not for articles about texts. RedRabbit1983 14:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit]  ???

This is not an aria! is a section of a duet.... an article about a section of a duet?! --Al Pereira(talk) 02:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

This is a rather ridiculous article. It is not an aria, and the mention of Callas is questionable. Also, I would hardly describe Butterfly as verismo. This should be severly shorn and merged with the main article, which I will do shortly. --203.129.50.179 09:14, 30 June 2007 (UTC) After I remember to log in. --Alexs letterbox 09:18, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Absolutely agree. --Al Pereira(talk) 09:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit]  ??? second part

I don't see any reason to have an article about a section of a duet. In addition to this, the article doesn't say anything. --Al Pereira(talk) 05:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

And it is not the most famous part of the duet. --Al Pereira(talk) 05:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
I agree, there is nothing special or famous about this part at all. It should be merged with the main article - Jay (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)