Talk:Versace
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is not a forum for general discussion of rumours about the Versace family.. Any such messages will be deleted. Please limit discussion to improvement of the article. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the Fashion WikiProject. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page to find other ways of helping. Thanks! |
||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
||
| High | This article is on a subject of High-importance within fashion. | ||
 |
It is requested that one or more images be included in this article to improve its quality. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
 |
Versace is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. | |
|
I think the information about Donatella committing suicide in 9/06 is false and should be deleted. 5/21/07
== Hi! I would really like it if you could find more info on Versace. I'm very interested in fashion and designers. If you know something about Versace that is not in this page, please edit it. Thanks! ==]]
Why don't you buy some stuff and learn about it. While you're doing that you can learn about Versace from the people who work in the Boutique.
The grammar in this article is atrocious 70.137.142.207 12:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] I attempted to clean-up this article...
While this article still needs some serious work, and plenty more citations, I attempted to fix some of the terrible grammar errors. If you plan on editing this article, pay special attention to the "Going Public" section. As it was worded by the former author, the meaning was messy and jumbled, and I could find no information to clarify the subject. Thanks --KristaCalla 15:50, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Author
Why would you want to deauthor me, seen as how I wrote most of it and my oh so shocking grammar! --Djkinsella 23:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Suitly emphazi, please. --Darkfred Talk to me 23:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
What is not to understand? I added to the article in depth a few months ago, but I'm no longer listed on the history page; does this mean I was removed as an author? If so, why? What an odd thing to do.--Djkinsella 22:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Trust me, you are still on the history page. Noone has removed you, in fact it is nearly impossible to remove a block of history. Only one or two people are authorized to do it. One or two people have complained about your grammar, but this is no problem, it was fixed quickly by a native english speaker. In fact if you would like help with grammar send me a message and I can proof read for you. --Darkfred Talk to me 23:33, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Were you perhaps accidentally checking the history of this discussion page, rather than the history of the main article page. Its a mistake I've made several times in the past and can be confusing. -- Solipsist 05:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Ah never mind! Perhaps I was, I just thought I'd done something really wrong and was removed because of it! One thing that irritates me at the moment with this is this "Persace" thing, I've never heard of it, someone keeps adding it. A Google search produces no evidence of validity. Thank you both for clarifying :-)--Djkinsella 13:26, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- The Persace thing appears to be completely invented bullshit from what I have researched. Even if it was true it wouldn't merit inclusion. Just because I collect cards doesn't mean i should be included in the card article. --Darkfred Talk to me 16:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Haha very true. Thank you again. Djkinsella 22:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- The Persace thing appears to be completely invented bullshit from what I have researched. Even if it was true it wouldn't merit inclusion. Just because I collect cards doesn't mean i should be included in the card article. --Darkfred Talk to me 16:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Ah never mind! Perhaps I was, I just thought I'd done something really wrong and was removed because of it! One thing that irritates me at the moment with this is this "Persace" thing, I've never heard of it, someone keeps adding it. A Google search produces no evidence of validity. Thank you both for clarifying :-)--Djkinsella 13:26, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Were you perhaps accidentally checking the history of this discussion page, rather than the history of the main article page. Its a mistake I've made several times in the past and can be confusing. -- Solipsist 05:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
I find your continual dismissals of the Persace issue very narrow minded. Simply because neither of you are aware of the Persace movement that does not mean that it doesn’t exist. Though admittedly you've gone through the foolproof avenue of Google to check its validity, because if something isn't on Google, then by default it doesn't exist. Persace is a cultural movement, spawned from one individual's horrific taste in Versace clothing. The term is widely recognised as slang for anything negative and I am shocked and annoyed that it is constantly being edited off this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.9.72.247 (talk • contribs)
- Continue being shocked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djkinsella (talk • contribs)
Ha-ha aren't you funny, still we'll see who's laughing at the end of the day, there is a team of people behind the Persace revolution. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.9.72.247 (talk • contribs)
-
- Currently, I am. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djkinsella (talk • contribs)
Tell me is it satisfying editing an online encyclopedia with no monetary benefits? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.9.72.247 (talk • contribs)
- Yep :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djkinsella (talk • contribs)
- Tell me mr. 84.9.72.247 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) is it satisfying to add hoaxes to an online encyclopedia with no monetary benefits? --Darkfred Talk to me 23:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] "Versace is the most famous design company in the world."
Where is this coming from? That needs to be taken off there unless you can provide some sort of basis.
[edit] Size Zero o muerte!
The Versace heir has severe anorexia and is in intensive care with bad outlook, at least some tabloid wrote that yesterday. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.131.210.162 (talk) 13:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Versace.png
Image:Versace.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:10, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
hey diz me sandra just wanted to know if u kan find me some more clothes on versace thanks alot . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.60.175.41 (talk) 22:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Versace.png
Image:Versace.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
