Talk:Urmila Matondkar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indian cinema, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Indian cinema. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. (add comments) |
|
More information about this article...
|
|
My Dear Friends, How can Urmila Matondkar be born on 4th February,1973 when my friend who was in her class in King George High School,Dadar,Mumbai was born in 1968 and she also passed out from school in 1984 (Her 10th Standard Class,S.S.C.).My friend is of June,1968 and she should also be of 1968. Now she should be exactly 37 years old. She is bluffing that she is of 1973 birth.
From, goodsfriends@indiatimes.com
- Please read WP:V. --Gurubrahma 09:58, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
actually do I agree with "goodfriends" even though I dont know which year she was born. Jugal Hansraj who you can see that is quite younger than urmila in massom is born in 1972, it means that she must be older than him, thus born before 1973/4. Dhirad 15:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Peer review
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
- The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.[?]
- Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and WP:CONTEXT.[?]
- This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[?]
- If this article is about a person, please add
{{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}}along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.[?] - There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Shahid • Talk2me 04:08, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
