User talk:Umrguy42/Archive 1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
IP warning
The IP you warned a few days back was apparently trying to create a redirect. The IP is a self-declared noob (see here). Just thought you should know. :) --Gp75motorsports REV LIMITER 21:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- P.S. I did not mean "noob" in a derogatory fashion. --Gp75motorsports REV LIMITER 21:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- No prob. ;) --Gp75motorsports REV LIMITER 23:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC
Dale Earnhardt Jr.
Carl Edwards who actually won the race actually got penalized for cheating and earned enough points to finish 26th so technically Dale Jr. now has 18 wins because he had more points.(Gordon24fan (talk) 04:39, 7 March 2008 (UTC))
Doctor Who
I take your point; however, WP:V applies and anything unsourced is liable to be challenged and removed; sure, if you can find a reliable source, feel free to put it back in. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 17:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- I can see the problem here, History of Doctor Who presumably sources the continuation from an offline source, and it's obviously implicit in Eccleston being the 9th Doctor that it is intended to be a continuation. I would suggest reverting for now and see if anyone complains; but to take bits here and there from other articles to justify the continuation is a technically a breach of WP:SYNTH, although I doubt if anyone will whinge. References to other sci-fi series as examples, however, are OR. Hope that helps. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 17:46, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Re: Missouri Caves
See my response on my talk page, and feel free to amend the article in any approrpiate manner. --Kbh3rdtalk 22:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Your request
Hello... I've looked at the page and given that there are only two edits, it is probably premature to lock things down. However, please let me know if the problem returns. (I'll also keep the page on my watchlist for a few days as well.) Cheers. --Ckatzchatspy 08:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter, March 2008
 |
The Space-Time Telegraph | |
||||
| The WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter | ||||||
| Issue 1 | March 2008 | |||||
For the Doctor Who project, Sceptre (talk) 19:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
||||||
Sarah Jane and the Five Doctors—response
As the third Doctor clearly recognizes Sarah when they first encounter each other in this story, he has not been taken out of time from before he met her. Indeed, as he has a good idea of what his next incarnation will look like ("all teeth and curls"), this figures to be very late in his "life" from his perspective. His "Nice meeting you, too" to her is in direct response to her saying the same to #5. That she doesn't understand is just not open to reasonable debate. Nice thought, but all facts considered, it doesn't work. On the other hand, Ckatz has taken out the details but left the core statement that she doesn't realize #5 is the same Doctor as he and #4 whom she saw him turn into in the article, which is good enough for me. (Just got your "moot" note!) Ted Watson (talk) 21:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
User talk:Robinepowell
Yep, I changed the wrong parameter. I'm not so great with adjusting templates once they are expanded like that. I changed an "If" argument instead of the length amount. Some days I'm a little slow. Thanks for the tip. Cheers, Pigman☿ 05:04, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Nice vandal fighting
 |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For beating me several time when reverting vandalism on St. Louis, Missouri and for keeping an eye on all Missouri University of Science and Technology articles -Grey Wanderer | Talk 01:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC) |
Welcome Templating
Thanks again for helping out with that welcome templating. It is appreciated. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 19:58, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Copyright issues
Did you notice the very large "This page under construction" flag across the top of the article before you tagged it for deletion? It was clearly a work in progress. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ejteltschik (talk • contribs) 01:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Scrubs entry
"Hello, if you have a citation to the LA Times article you mentioned in your edit summary, could you please place it in the article? I moved the sentence you added after the two references, as neither of those contains that information. If you can, please replace the {{fact}} tag with the reference. (If you any need help with it, feel free to send me the link, and I'd be happy to put it in.) thanks! --Umrguy42 (talk) 18:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)"
Sorry about that, I don't know how I didn't properly cite the article. I had to dig for it again. Here's the quote in the article: "McPherson also confirmed that ABC has picked up "Scrubs," which NBC canceled after what was supposed to be its seventh and final season. The single-camera comedy, produced by ABC Studios, would have ended its run this month, but NBC chose not to produce the final episodes."
"Now it will air in midseason at 9 p.m. Tuesdays. The run could extend to future seasons if it performs well, McPherson said. "It helps us as we're expanding our comedy franchise," McPherson said."
Are you able to add the entry back into the Scrubs article? I'm still a newbie. http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-upfronts14-2008may14,0,3549448.story
RE: Sig
The yellow is permanently etched into my retinas, I believe... just kidding, but it is a 'bit' too light. Just a bit. <3 Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 21:19, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ooh, I like this new version. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 21:30, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to WikiProject Catholicism!
Hello, Umrguy42/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikiproject Catholicism! Thank you for your generous offer to help
contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a Catholic Project Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the project talk page, or to leave a message on my own talk page. Please remember to sign all your comments, and be bold with your edits. Again, welcome, and happy editing! Bewareofdog 00:15, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
