Talk:Tristan Tzara/GA1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA Review
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 9, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Pass - although with some issues
- 2. Factually accurate?: Pass - definately enough refs
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Pass - perhaps overly detailed
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass - couldn't fin anything wrong.
- 5. Article stability? Pass
- 6. Images?: Pass - barely but it is not an article that would require many images anyways.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.
Now in more detail I can say that I still have some issues with the article, altough it is good enough to be listed as a good article. Here are the suggestions if anyone would want to take the article to FA:
- firstly, the article is perhaps overly detailed. The article almost contains unnecessary details.
- waaay too many red links. I understand that those people are not important and that is why no article is written about then... but then, should their name be here in the first place? This is closely related to the previous point. I believe that the article would make a lot of sense without so much overly-detailed information. Right now, it reads really hard, and I had problems concentrating on the point of the argument. This page should not be a book, and the information should not be copied word-by-word from the referencing books.
- this is perhaps not essential, but an FA would definately require it: MORE images. Even the portrait is at least a little ambigous. I bet there is one free picture somewhere with his bust, and that there are some pictures somewhere with his work.
I hope it helped and good luck with the article. Nergaal (talk) 02:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
