User:Trödel

• James Meredith • 11 Oct 2006
• Martin Luther • 20 July 2006
• SCO v. IBM • confusing
• Book of Mormon • very LDS centric
• Heavenly Mother • 20 July 2006 (done?)
• Kelly Reno • 15 July 2006
• Southern Virginia University • 11 July 2006

• List of temples • 5 July 2006
• Generic citations • 3 July 2006
• Precious Doe • 30 June 2006
• Anti-Mormonism • 30 June 2006
• Citing the Bible • 26 June 2006
• Frances Oldham Kelsey • 9 June 2006
• Bishop (Mormonism) • 25 May 2006
• Priesthood (Mormonism) • 1 March 2005
• Atonement • 2 October 2006

• Handcart pioneers • 30 June 2006 LDS CoM

• Potential articles                                edit

I've been thinking about this key principle: "[What] reliable sources ... have in common is process and approval between document creation and publication." This is also the key to Wikipedia's reliability and reputation. The core principles of neutrality and verifiability along with the standards for articles (featured/good/etc) and the implicit approval of every person who reads an article and makes no changes to it.

We (Americans) often "borrow" other people's intellectual property because the transaction method (i.e. limited use permission) does not exist and can not be created without the transaction cost exceeding the value of the permission (which is close to $0.00 in most cases) so we keep using other's work, and they don't sue us.

There is a great disconnect between how athiests view the proper place for religion in the public square, and how religionist view the proper place of religion in the public square. Briefly, atheists (usually) want no religion in the public square, and religionists want equal access (non-denominational) to the public square and view athiesm as just one other "religion" (for lack of a better term) that needs that access.

Tithing • Theology • Christian Science • Children of Record • Why Edit is on Introduction • The Bible and BoM