Talk:Tom Humphries

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

	Ireland Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Ireland on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the priority scale.

Patrick Keaney, not Brian Keaney, was Ralph Nader's 2000 campaign adviser as per [1], [2]).

Sorry - you are wrong on this. PATRICK Keaney worked for Nader in Massachussets. BRIAN Keaney worked for Nader in Florida. TWO Keaneys worked for Nader in 2000. Patrick in Massachussets, Brian in Florida. Two different people, Brian was at Joeys with Tom. Patrick was at school in Boston.

MaggieMae 15:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

This stuff about 'future editor' is nonsense and probably written by Humphries himself. I'm removing it now.

I agree with you. But did you really think he is the type of person (or maybe an agent did it?) to write such a thing himself? Personally, I like his writing, and can see to some degree why he would be highly sought after. On the other hand, I question whether this is the place for that kind of comment and wonder why people dare to write such things without a single citation, at least. That said, just to be clear, I fully support the change you made. Good edit! W.C. 16:31, 9 August 2006 (UTC)