Talk:Timeline of the Manhattan Project

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ]
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.
Help with this template Please rate this article, and then leave comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify its strengths and weaknesses.

_ _ I'm inclined to push the start of the timeline back at least a few years earlier (with much less frequent milestones), and maybe far enuf to include discovery of radioactivity.
_ _ In any case, IMO the years should be subsections of at least 3 higher-order headings, e.g.

• Context (or "Origins" or "Pre-conditions")
• WWII and the Bomb (probably beginning with invasion of China or repudiation of Versailles, & ending with VJ Day)
• Post-war

_ _ Feedback?
--Jerzy•t 19:36, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

• Well, it's suppose to be primarily the history of the U.S. program, not just nuclear weapons in general, so I think starting it with the Einstein/Szilard letter makes the most sense. I initially wrote it up to serve as a reference for editing the Manhattan Project article and other such purposes, because it is hard to keep all of these things straight, and only entered in the WWII-related info that seems immediately relevant (i.e. the entrance of the US into the war). So..I think that i might be gay I'm inclined to say that there shouldn't be too much context here, just because it is a list which is meant to be optimized towards the Manhattan Project (rather than a Timeline of World War II or something like that). But I'm open to talk about it.
  --Fastfission 00:11, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

I think i need to emphasize the sparseness of the additions i'm talking abt, and i agree that the letter and the AEC are the points where 4 to 10 milestones per year should start and end. In fact, i think they are very close to where 1 (sub-)section per year should start and end, and that there is no need, outside the year-per-section portion, for more than a year or even a decade per bullet point. The logic of that is that the added milestonse are not a substitute for a full-scale WWII or nukes timeline -- nor would those other timelines substitute well for the additions, bcz they have too much info, too many milestones. Shall i try suggesting at least a few milestones? Milestones maybe not so much for context as for perspective?
--Jerzy•t 00:14, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

You're of course welcome to add things! If there is anything that seems unnecessary we can talk about it afterwards. --Fastfission 16:07, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Actually, my unpolished thots on this & my inexperience w/ timelines incline me more to brainstorming here first. E.g.:

Physics

• late 17th century Isaac Newton initiates mathematical physics
• late 19th century - Henri Becquerel discovers radioactivity (& Marie Curie?)
• 1900s - Ernest Rutherford discovers the nucleus & achieves nuclear transmutation (check order of these)
• 1905 - Einstein formulates mass-energy equivalence
• 1930s - Lise Meitner (& Otto Hahn) - nuclear fission

Politics

• late 19th century - Otto von Bismark - unification of Germany
• late 19th century - Commodore Perry (1854) & Meiji period in Japan
• 1904/05 - Russo-Japanese War
• 1910s - WWI
• early 1930s - Second Sino-Japanese War
• 1935 - Repudiation of Treaty of Versailles
• 1938 - Munich, occupation of Czechoslovakia, & embargoing of Czech uranium

2nd & 3rd Einstein letters

I think it's fine to end with the conversion to AEC, especially since that corresponded to a mission that was dramatically different (despite being intimately related). But there should be a lk not just to AEC, but to timeline(s) of Cold War and post-Soviet nuclear development.

I'm not sure this needs to be the "prelude" within Manh. Proj.; could be a Timeline of the Emergence of the Nuclear Age.

--Jerzy•t 07:31, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

According to Stephane Groueff's book Manhattan Project: The Untold Story of the Making of the Atomic Bomb, Groves didn't purchase the site until the 24th, when he visited the site the day after he was named a general and had a meeting with Stimson and Marshall. JKBrooks85 02:54, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Why does it say "he [Einstein] later regretted signing the letter"? Some more information about why he regretted it would be most helpful. Was it because signing the letter led to the creation of such a horrible bomb? What's the story here??Jedi Shadow 02:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] bohemian grove meeting?

In the article for Bohemian grove It says:

The Grove is particularly famous for a Manhattan Project planning meeting that took place there in September 1942, which subsequently led to the atomic bomb. Those attending this meeting, apart from Ernest Lawrence and military officials, included the president of Harvard and representatives of Standard Oil and General Electric. Grove members take particular pride in this event and often relate the story to new attendees.

Is this relevant to the list? Hulahulahulahula (talk) 17:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)