Talk:Timeline of Serbian history
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| The factual accuracy of this article is disputed. Please see the relevant discussion on the talk page. (March 2008) |
How can you write such crap? "Serbian Uskoks in Senj"? And lot more of that idiotism... Kubura 21:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
true, this article is a mess —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.122.128 (talk) 18:40, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Simply stating that the article is "crap" or "a mess" is insufficient reason for attaching the POV or dispusted tags to it. No evidence or argument has been provided to support the POV tag. The article is well-supported by footnotes. Unless something more academic than personal opinion can be brought forth, the POV tag should be removed from this page. MishaPan (talk) 19:47, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Style and content
There are, of course, serious issues with grammar and style in this article, and some controversy over factual accuracy. I am not an expert in European history, so I cannot claim to recognize historical inaccuracy here. I may, however, change some things which I know are disingenuous or incorrect. One example that comes to mind is the claim of US backing of the KLA as fact. Hopefully this article can be cleaned up to a usable level. BecauseWhy? (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- I think I have done as much as I can to improve this article. I was surprised to find that there is some evidence of US and European involvement with the KLA, so I rephrased that and kept it. I do not think there is reliable evidence that the KLA were Islamic. I am also pretty sure that the Raçak killings were not only of terrorists, because the Serbian government itself, which committed the killings, does not say so. I have left comments in the page.
- I do hope that someone with greater knowledge of the history can further edit and improve this article. BecauseWhy? (talk) 22:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

