Talk:The Pilot (Friends)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] notice of episode article review
The individual episode articles for Friends (season one) are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines. Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:List of Friends episodes#Episode article review (Season 1). Thanks. -- Jack Merridew 11:05, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Title
Is it really referred to as "The Pilot" and not simply "pilot"? Most shows, which do not give an actual title for the first episode, simply go with "pilot". I find it odd that this is actually called "The Pilot", but it could be. I just want to make sure someone wasn't putting in an article by mistake. Is this how it is referred to on the DVD box set? If not, then it needs to be simply "Pilot (Friends)". Speaking of, unless there is some other article that is associated with the Friends series using the name "Pilot", then "episode" needs to be dropped from the title per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television)#Episode articles. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 04:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, Sangster, Stallings, Wild and the DVDs all have it listed as "the". As for the "episode", it used to be correctly titled but someone moved it and I couldn't move it back over the redirect. Brad 08:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- So it's printed on the box pamphlet (or whatever Friends uses to list episode titles on paper) as "The Pilot", instead of saying something like "the pilot"? Ok. Anyway, I put in a speedy deletion request for that other page, and also asked the deleting admin to go ahead and move this page to that name when he/she does delete. Hopefully that will take place. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 11:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Title fixed. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 21:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] GA pass
Yup, everything is in order. Alientraveller 16:08, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA Sweeps (Pass)
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, MASEM 05:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

