Talk:The New Avengers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
An appropriate infobox needs to be added to this article, or the current infobox needs to be updated. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject British TV shows, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British TV shows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project British TV shows, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
[edit] Page name
Hi. Should this article move to The New Avengers (which redirects here)? Or is there another New Avengers it might need disambiguating from? —Whouk (talk) 08:31, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Marvel Comics has a comic book series called The New Avengers, so if anything the redirect page should become a disambiguation page. 23skidoo 13:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- That's fair enough then - although a disambig page isn't really needed for two. If we can get a consensus as to what's the more likely search (and therefore the more useful to have at the disambiguated name), that can go at The New Avengers and both articles would have dablinks above the lead. —Whouk (talk) 14:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe you can straighten this out. I was under the impression that Wikistyle says to disambiguate even with 2, and I've seen a number of AFD votes that would seem to bear this out. Are you aware of any particular policy one way or the other? 23skidoo 18:08, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Top links says you only need a disambig page for more than two. —Whouk (talk) 18:28, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe you can straighten this out. I was under the impression that Wikistyle says to disambiguate even with 2, and I've seen a number of AFD votes that would seem to bear this out. Are you aware of any particular policy one way or the other? 23skidoo 18:08, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- That's fair enough then - although a disambig page isn't really needed for two. If we can get a consensus as to what's the more likely search (and therefore the more useful to have at the disambiguated name), that can go at The New Avengers and both articles would have dablinks above the lead. —Whouk (talk) 14:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:AvengersBook2.jpg
Image:AvengersBook2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
