Talk:The Idolmaster
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] AWWW
How come we never get these kind of games in America? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.88.230.214 (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ace Combat 6
Just a question to see how everyone feels about this, but should the references of the Idolmaster skin packs for Namco's Ace Combat 6 game be given within the Character section, stay exclusively in the Other Games section, or should it be given a section of its own? I've noticed each skin featuring the girls comes out roughly around the chracter's official birthday, and would venture to say that all of them will most likely get one eventually. Houko (talk) 06:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
This article has been renamed from The Idolm@ster to The Idolmaster as the result of a move request.
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was - unanimous move as per WP:MOSTM. Keith D (talk) 12:04, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
The Idolm@ster → The Idolmaster — MOS:TM states that "Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules even if the trademark owner encourages special treatment". —Mika1h (talk) 21:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support, since the @ in official title is likely for stylize purpose only. And we need to follow MOS:TM —29th ((☎)) 22:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Clear violation of WP:MOSTM. Andrewa (talk) 02:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support, as the game is apparently frequently refered to as "The Idolmaster", even by its creators. The @ is really cosmetic, and thus has no place in article name per the already-mentioned guidelines. Bikasuishin (talk) 12:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support as above. Callmederek (talk) 20:21, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Songs of ts steiner (talk) 19:50, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support per everyone.Whydontyoucallme dantheman (talk) 01:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

