Talk:The Hills Grammar School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.	Schools Portal
Low	This article has been rated as Low-Importance within Schools.
	This page should be moved to Hills Grammar School
Assessment: Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school article. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of Start on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Low on this importance scale. For information on improving this article, please visit the WikiProject Schools Project Page. My reasoning is as follows: Not much here and no references. Adam McCormick 22:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Portal	The Hills Grammar School is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Criticisms

Will delete this section if there is no argument. Not well referenced, and POV. Recurring dreams 22:30, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

I have attempted to wikify this but have not changed the content. I agree the Criticisms section should go. It is POV and unreferenced. Avalon 00:40, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

No, the criticisms are acurate ~soldier313

Accureate is not the point, attributable is. Adam McCormick 22:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)