Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 April 24

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete (see bellow) - Nabla (talk) 19:40, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Template:CommonsImageSummary (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Obsolete template that was superseded by {{Information}}. A redirect is unsuitable as this template does not transfer correctly when images are moved to Commons. All transclusions have been replaced by {{Information}}.. Kelly ^hi! 23:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Weak oppose - though I acknowledge the Information template supersedes this, I don't know how many images scattered throughout are currently using this template. If this does go ahead for deletion, is there a convenient way to list all image-pages which will need to be updated? Nimur (talk) 05:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

All usages have already been replaced (also {{ImageSummary}}, below). Kelly ^hi! 12:27, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete - Nabla (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Template:ImageSummary (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Obsolete template that was superseded by {{Information}}. A redirect is unsuitable as this template does not transfer correctly when images are moved to Commons. All transclusions have been replaced by {{Information}}.. Kelly ^hi! 23:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Weak oppose - though I acknowledge the Information template supersedes this, I don't know how many images scattered throughout are currently using this template. If this does go ahead for deletion, is there a convenient way to list all image-pages which will need to be updated? Nimur (talk) 05:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

See above. Kelly ^hi! 12:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Wow, I have just noticed a bunch of bot transfers to the new template. I have no objection to removal now. Nimur (talk) 14:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete - Nabla (talk) 18:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

None of these 39 templates have any incoming links and, based on comments made at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football, it seems that they need not and/or should not be used. Black Falcon ^(Talk) 19:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Unused templates should be disposed of. – PeeJay 20:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Kleinzach (talk) 04:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep, I could use'em here. --necronudist (talk) 14:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (flags), "flag images should be useful to the reader, not merely decorative". I think that the addition of hundreds of multi-coloured flags on a list like List of foreign Serie A players would significantly diminish the readability of the article. Black Falcon ^(Talk) 17:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
    • See the Italian version and judge yourself. --necronudist (talk) 21:02, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
      • The Italian page clearly shows why these icons should not be used. Delete. --Kildor (talk) 07:24, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per Kildor. Punkmorten (talk) 19:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. Unused templates and useless as well. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:39, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete - Nabla (talk) 18:40, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Template:Clubs and Societies at Queen's University Belfast (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Most university societies are not noteable, to have a template to list them seems pointless Fasach Nua (talk) 16:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete -- per nom. --Kleinzach (talk) 04:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)--
• Strong delete - there are far too many college trivia templates already, and this one would just encourage the creation of articles about nn campus clubs. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:25, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Woohookitty^Woohoo! 04:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Template:Classical composer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Unused infobox, same arguments as 2 previous discussions here and here. There's currently a consensus against using any such template. Notice left at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Composers#Template/Infobox again?.RobertG ♬ talk 06:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete -- per consensus against use. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 11:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete -- per consensus against use. --Kleinzach (talk) 13:59, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per consensus. --Folantin (talk) 14:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per above.--Berig (talk) 17:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete I thought it has been deleted long ago? - Jay (talk) 02:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.