User talk:Tavix

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Posts over three months or so are deleted off of this page. If you want to look for older posts, use the history tab.

If you post on my talk page, I will reply here, so don't expect me to post replies on your talk page.

Contents

[edit] Edit summaries and minor edits

I reverted your edits to Mackinac Island and Template:Protected Areas of Michigan. In the Mackinac Island edit, you said that you moved an image, which you did, but you also removed another completely and changed the formatting of the references section. On the template, you removed a bunch of redlinks with no edit summary and marked it as a minor edit. Links should not be removed simply because no article exists yet. Articles could feasibly exist at those titles and the red links are an invitation to create them, and removal of content should not be marked as a minor edit. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 20:09, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] jamiecg74

As much as I appreciate any comments, saying "there are absolutely no references that would tell me if any of this crap is true" - to be honest, I find this a negative and poor comment. If you had been more objective to the article, as wikipedia is anyway then i would have glady accepted your comment. I could easily say that you are talking crap too, but that's not what I want to do as it just causes unnecessary friction between myself and you. --Jamiecg74 (talk) 22:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Westminster Christian Academy (Missouri) Edits

I have a few questions about your recent edits to Westminster Christian Academy (Missouri).

1. Why did you remove the two alumni (Stephen Hauser & Mark Hearne)?

2. Why did you combine the alumni and staff? The separate list was per the suggested sections of WP:WPSCHOOLS.

3. Why did you remove the headmasters section? Again, it was added as a suggested section of WP:WPSCHOOLS with the intention of adding additional information about each.

4. I think that the school is accredited is a very important detail. Why did you remove that information?

I don't have any problem with your removal of the other lists. However, it was my intention to use much of that information in text sections and it was only in a list until I got it further along. Look forward to hearing from you on my questions and working on improving this acticle! Thanks. Hjg001 (talk) 13:59, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 13 May 2008 Jaipur bombings

Please discuss before making such edits. --AI009 (talk) 02:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Date articles

Are you actually planning on copying the content of the daily information into the month article? What was wrong with the data being transcluded as it was before? Corvus cornixtalk 19:00, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Yes, what I am planning on doing is to go though all of the individual date articles, and copy the content to the month article. There are two reasons why I am doing this: When the data was transcluded, it was in the month article but if you wanted to edit anything you would have to go over to the individual date article to edit it. From me merging the info, it makes it easier to edit by taking that extra step away. The other reason would be from a centralized discussion topic I found here. Most of the people on that discussion wanted to move/merge the date articles, so I am simply fulfilling that consensus. Tavix (talk) 19:18, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Ah. Understand. Thanks. Corvus cornixtalk 20:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC)