Talk:Tírechán

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Ireland on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the priority scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
Middle Ages Icon Tírechán is part of WikiProject Middle Ages, a project for the community of Wikipedians who are interested in the Middle Ages. For more information, see the project page and the newest articles.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.


[edit] Merge?

Well, both articles are stubs and contain largely the same information. As the creator, I'd obviously back this one.  ;-) But in seriousness, I think it's important to try to preserve traditional Irish spellings except in cases where the anglicised form has become so widely accepted that returning to it would cause confusion. I don't think that's the case with Tírechán. Dppowell 14:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. Don't see much need for discussion really. Do it! Do it now! :-) Gil Gamesh 16:56, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
All sounds good to me. fluoronaut 17:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Manuscript?

Any idea which manuscript(s) this work survives in? I've got the Book of Armagh in my head but not sure whether this is right (and no time to look it up just now.) fluoronaut 19:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I see it's directly mentioned in the BoA article. Will add a reference. fluoronaut 20:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)