Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Sly-eye

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

[edit] User:Sly-eye

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Sly-eye (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Sly-ey (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Richwills (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Atomic1609 20:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Evidence

The user names Sly-eye and Sly-ey are very similar and have removed the speedy deletion template from Kyle collins on several occasions, even after being warned. Atomic1609 20:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Richwills may not be a sock puppet, but has performed similar edits to the same page as well. Atomic1609 21:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Check individual user talk pages for warnings about removing speedy deletion tags.

Comments

Note that the page in question, Kyle collins, has now been deleted. Atomic1609 16:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

• I don't have access to the deleted history, but these accounts seem clearly connected by the repeated removal of speedy deletion tags on Kyle collins. Even though there's been no activity on the puppet accounts since early Feb. (with the deletion of Kyle collins Sly-ey has no contributions), it seems like the puppets should be blocked, because User:Sly-eye is still active. --Akhilleus (talk) 02:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Conclusions

Obvious socks blocked indef, puppetmaster blocked for a week. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)