User talk:Storm05/Tropical Storm Fabian (1991)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] WP:RM
Storm05, since you are the only editor of the revised article, you don't need admin assistance - you can just do a copy/paste move. BigDT 16:17, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Okay, i hope it doesnt affect GDFL. Storm05 16:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Uh, you can't, actually, because while that user was making that comment I was actually cleaning up your lede to remove whitespace. Sorry about that. – Chacor 16:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- This is an obvious attempt to keep the article from being moved, but it won't succeed. Use the copy from this version, prior to Chacor's edit. That version is entirely your work and there is nothing wrong with committing it under your name. – Anþony talk 18:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- I have to agree Chacor. Either state your opposition or support, but don't Disrupt Wikipedia in order to prove a point. -Patstuarttalk|edits 18:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- So what happened to WP:AGF, huh? An honest edit to remove whitespace and make a grammatical fix gets dismissed as disruption? Don't make false accusations. Shame on yourselves. – Chacor 00:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Regardless, in the interests of improving the encyclopedia, I've given this article a major copyedit (almost a re-write). I do not think it would be wise at this time to let storm05 copy and paste his last version which had errors, and present that as a Wikipedia article, when there's a better version available. At this time I'd support the move. – Chacor 11:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- So what happened to WP:AGF, huh? An honest edit to remove whitespace and make a grammatical fix gets dismissed as disruption? Don't make false accusations. Shame on yourselves. – Chacor 00:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- I have to agree Chacor. Either state your opposition or support, but don't Disrupt Wikipedia in order to prove a point. -Patstuarttalk|edits 18:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- This is an obvious attempt to keep the article from being moved, but it won't succeed. Use the copy from this version, prior to Chacor's edit. That version is entirely your work and there is nothing wrong with committing it under your name. – Anþony talk 18:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Uh, you can't, actually, because while that user was making that comment I was actually cleaning up your lede to remove whitespace. Sorry about that. – Chacor 16:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, i hope it doesnt affect GDFL. Storm05 16:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Moved disussion from WP:RM
-
- Should admins be held responsible for possible copyvio, or false information in sandbox articles of others they move into mainspace? I say yes. To whoever does decide to move this, I'd advise a thorough investigation of the sandbox - see evidence that this user has previously incorporated, verbatim, his sources into his sandbox articles. – Chacor 15:26, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Since Storm05 is the only editor of the source article, no admin assistance is needed - just do a copy/paste move. BigDT 16:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't see you had made that note. I was removing whitespace and did a minor copyedit to the article. Sorry! :/ – Chacor 16:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- OK, I'm just coming in on this one, but I almost have to laugh. Why are people arguing so ferociously about a hurricane article (next thing you know, we'll be placing {{NPOV}} tags on Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer). Unless I'm missing something, is there some WP:SPIDER going on here (I don't mean to be rude; this was an honest question). Patstuarttalk|edits 19:01, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Copyright vios should be taken seriously, as should the introduction of false info [we do have {{verror}}, after all]. – Chacor 00:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Where's the copyvio? If it's a copyright problem, then list it at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2006 December 14/Articles. But if it's rejected, then move on. -Patstuarttalk|edits 00:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Copyright vios should be taken seriously, as should the introduction of false info [we do have {{verror}}, after all]. – Chacor 00:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- OK, I'm just coming in on this one, but I almost have to laugh. Why are people arguing so ferociously about a hurricane article (next thing you know, we'll be placing {{NPOV}} tags on Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer). Unless I'm missing something, is there some WP:SPIDER going on here (I don't mean to be rude; this was an honest question). Patstuarttalk|edits 19:01, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't see you had made that note. I was removing whitespace and did a minor copyedit to the article. Sorry! :/ – Chacor 16:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
