Talk:Star Trek: Voyager: Elite Force
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
External Links has been split into External Links, Clans, and Roleplaying Groups.
[edit] Unbalanced game
Most of the time, I was able to go forth and slaughter the enemies like chicken, so it practically shocked me when I encountered bosses and minibosses. For example, Hirogen Alpha and the Borg minibosses (not to mention the final boss, INSANE!) required me to reload MANY times to get through. Seems quite unbalanced to me. Other than that, the game is great though, just when I replayed it (several times) I really had no wish to bother with those bosses again, so I used godmode with them. It made playing the game a breeze, and not that it's not interesting enough so to get bored because of that. I believe those bosses so different in difficulty from the rest of the game were just unnecessary. Well, if they thought the game is too easy it would be nicer if they just made the regular enemies a bit tougher instead of tossing in super-badass-bosses. I'm not sure if it's just me, but if there are some reviews which say something similar, perhaps that info should be included in the article too. --Arny 02:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Telsia?
Whats up with the telsia-Alex thing? i never noticed it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.32.88.133 (talk) 20:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Although I've played the game and completed it, what do you mean SKYNET X1000 21:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Question cancelled, IP ADDRESS: 71.32.88.133|71.32.88.133 isn't a registered member, no response or comments will be given to a none registered user, if you want a response register an account on wikipedia. SKYNET X3000 (talk) 19:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Although this entire exchange is off-topic and not what talk-pages are intended for, User:SKYNET X3000's refusal to engage with an anonymous user is against the spirit of Wikipedia. --EEMIV (talk) 19:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Very well, i wasn't sure that it was against the spirit of wikipedia, I've released the question which is now back open i'm sorry. SKYNET X3000 (talk) 19:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ef234.jpg
Image:Ef234.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 09:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

