Talk:SR U Class

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article SR U Class has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
July 17, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
Trains Portal
Sel week 23, 2008
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance within the Trains WikiProject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Railways.
Mid Importance: mid within UK Railways WikiProject.
This article is within the scope of the Locomotives task force.

[edit] GA review

My checklist:

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

A few comments before I feel like I should pass this.

  • See WP:UNITS - a non-breaking space should be added between values and units (i.e. add a   between 2 and kg for 2 kg).
  • What does "mogul" mean in this context?
  • Spelling mistakes - I've corrected all I found, but please spell check in future before nominating.
  • Date or page ranges need to be delineated with en-dash (see WP:DASH).
I don't quite see what the problem is concerning delineation, unless you have already corrected this.--Bulleid Pacific 22:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Please attend to these and I'll move the article from being on hold to pass. The Rambling Man 17:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Okay, still a few MOS issues which I've now resolved myself (e.g. en-dashes, etc) so I'll move this to GA now. The Rambling Man 17:36, 19 July 2007 (UTC)