Talk:SR Lord Nelson class
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA review
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR): 
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned):
b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):
c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
- a (tagged and captioned):
- Overall:
Again, a good article. Perhaps more wikiliking but not a pre-requisite of GA, so, pass. The Rambling Man 17:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Categories: Wikipedia good articles | Wikipedia CD Selection-GAs | GA-Class Good articles | Engineering and technology good articles | GA-Class rail transport articles | Mid-importance rail transport articles | Trains portal selected articles | GA-Class UK Railways articles | Mid-importance UK Railways articles | Locomotives task force articles

