Talk:South Africa national cricket team

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

cricket ball
Cricket Portal
Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability
South Africa national cricket team is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
Template deprecated, please use {{AfricaProject |class=B|importance= |South Africa=yes}} instead.
 South Africa national cricket team is part of WikiProject South Africa, a WikiProject which aims to systematically improve South Africa-related articles using the tools on the Project page. You are welcome and encouraged to edit the article attached to this page and to join the project.

Contents

[edit] Sections

This article is dying for a breakdown into clear cut sections - but I dont feel up to it just yet! anyone? Tyhopho 21:03, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Turns out I was up to it :-) Look forwrad to seeing what anyone else makes of what Ive started with. Tyhopho 17:23, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Name?

Did the cricket team been called the Springboks during the past? Dr.Poison 00:24, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Before 1991, and yes, that deserves a mention in the article. Tintin (talk) 05:18, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
I was sure they were known as the Springboks in the 1992 World Cup and became the Proteas only in about 1993, though I can't find anything online to support that, nor am I South African.Thedangerouskitchen 10:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Okeay; I'm not saying that it shouldn't be mentioned. But shouldn't be mentioned that it was called bye that name before 1991? Dr.Poison 11:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
True, in the World Cup in 1992, they were still the Springbucks (not Springboks, please!). The South African rugby and cricket teams were officially known as the Springbucks (in English) and the Springbokke (in Afrikaans). It's a misnomer that they were the Springboks. Igitur za 15:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Why are they called the Proteas?82.5.50.61 23:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Flags and stuff

What flag to use on articles, e.g. Reggie Schwarz since there were three flags:

  • None 1889 (date of first test) -1910
  • 1910-1928
  • 1928-1991
  • 1991-present

Also in the infobox, which abbreviation to use since SA did not becom a republic until 1961 (and then what to do if careers overlapped)? — Dunc|☺ 14:41, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Current flag, as per Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cricket/archive2#Which_South_African_flag_should_we_use.3F Tintin (talk) 14:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

By the same logic, RSA should be used for all eras, though you can ask for opinions in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket Tintin (talk) 14:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quota comment

"Due to a racial quota policy, the side now contains coloured players, unlike the past"

Suggests (to me anyway) that the only reason that the side contains coloured players is because of quota system. This is blatently false. I am not defending quota systems (because I am heavily opposed to them) however the remark seems awefully out of place. Paul Hjul 10:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree. I think the quota system, and any controversy surrounding it, needs to be addressed in the article, but not in this way. Andrew nixon 10:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


sorry, don't know how to post this properly, but describing nasser hussain as the "then-english captain" is wrong; the hyphen placement suggests that nasser was english, but is not any longer

[edit] The Hansie scandal

AFAIK, Hansie was charged with accepting money and in return to provide match information (e.g. pitch condition) to the bookies, not to lose the match!? --Igitur za 15:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC)


"England eventually won the match and the series, but the decision was applauded for increasing the chance of a result, instead of a draw." England won the test, but not the series... England's first Test victory in post-Ap South Africa came under Vaughan.

[edit] 2006 world record one day chase "Greatest One-Day" ever

"This game is considered by many to be the greatest One-Day International ever played." The 1999 world cup semifinal is more commonly considered the greatest game of all time. While people may debate whether the 2006 run fest versus a game full of twists and turns is more watchable, the world cup match was clearly much more important, both in terms of the value of the tournament, and on the subsequent pyschological damage inflicted on the SA team (referred to earlier in the article". Ozbrettdj 15:27, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chokers?

I think the mentioning the word 'chokers' in the introductory paragraph of this article an objective point of view borders on slander. Many great sporting teams have been branded as chokers at some point or another.

The chokers reference should be altogether removed from this article.

Zamelo 13:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

The SA cricket side is not a great sporting team. Five of the eight major cricket playing countries have won the world cup, a sixth (England) has contested 3 finals. Only New Zealand and SA have failed to progress to a world cup final. Which makes the label best team to have never won the world cup a little silly. Unlike NZ, SA have continoulsy self imploded, and like it or not they wear the 'chokers' tag - spend a little time at cricinfo if you believe this is undeserved . Ozbrettdj 01:04, 28 April 2007 (UTC)