User talk:Soporaeternus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Contents

[edit] Speedy deletion of White Dolls

A tag has been placed on White Dolls requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. B. Wolterding (talk) 11:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Milo Turk

A tag has been placed on Milo Turk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 18:43, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your changes to Talk:Boxer Shorts

Yo, thanks for taking the time to edit Talk:Boxer_shorts instead of simply engaging in an edit war. Next time, though, try not to blank all the other content on the talk page so everyone has a chance to say what they want to say.  —Peco! Peco!TALK 02:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User page

Hi, I edited your user page to remove the link to myspace. It looked like you were trying to use wikipedia to promote the band you wrote about in And Bringer Of Light. Please don't use Wikipedia for promotional purposes. Friday (talk) 20:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Annavarneyblackwhite.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Annavarneyblackwhite.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Annavarneyisbeautiful.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Annavarneyisbeautiful.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)